BACKGROUND: Osteopontin has been suggested as a marker of disease progression in patients with melanoma because of its overexpression in recent microarray analyses. However, its prognostic role in melanoma has not been fully defined. METHODS: Osteopontin expression status was examined using immunohistochemical analysis of a tissue microarray that contained primary cutaneous melanomas from 345 patients. The correlation between osteopontin expression and several histologic markers for melanoma was assessed by using the Chi-square test and the Le directional test. The impact of osteopontin expression on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) of patients with melanoma was examined using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses. The impact of increasing osteopontin expression on sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis was assessed using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: High osteopontin expression was associated with increased tumor thickness (P = .037), Clark level (P = .035), and mitotic index (P = .046). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated an association between osteopontin expression and reduced RFS (P < .03) and DSS (P = .05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that high osteopontin immunostaining had an independent impact on the DSS of this melanoma cohort (P = .049). In addition, osteopontin expression was significantly predictive of SLN metastasis (P = .009) and SLN burden, as assessed by the mean number of SLN metastases (P = .0025). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated an independent role for osteopontin expression in predicting SLN status (P = .0062). CONCLUSIONS: The current results validated the role of osteopontin as an independent prognostic marker for melanoma and provided new evidence for its predictive role in melanoma lymph node metastasis. 2007 American Cancer Society
BACKGROUND:Osteopontin has been suggested as a marker of disease progression in patients with melanoma because of its overexpression in recent microarray analyses. However, its prognostic role in melanoma has not been fully defined. METHODS:Osteopontin expression status was examined using immunohistochemical analysis of a tissue microarray that contained primary cutaneous melanomas from 345 patients. The correlation between osteopontin expression and several histologic markers for melanoma was assessed by using the Chi-square test and the Le directional test. The impact of osteopontin expression on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) of patients with melanoma was examined using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses. The impact of increasing osteopontin expression on sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis was assessed using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: High osteopontin expression was associated with increased tumor thickness (P = .037), Clark level (P = .035), and mitotic index (P = .046). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated an association between osteopontin expression and reduced RFS (P < .03) and DSS (P = .05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that high osteopontin immunostaining had an independent impact on the DSS of this melanoma cohort (P = .049). In addition, osteopontin expression was significantly predictive of SLN metastasis (P = .009) and SLN burden, as assessed by the mean number of SLN metastases (P = .0025). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated an independent role for osteopontin expression in predicting SLN status (P = .0062). CONCLUSIONS: The current results validated the role of osteopontin as an independent prognostic marker for melanoma and provided new evidence for its predictive role in melanoma lymph node metastasis. 2007 American Cancer Society
Authors: Caroline Conway; Angana Mitra; Rosalyn Jewell; Juliette Randerson-Moor; Samira Lobo; Jérémie Nsengimana; Sara Edward; D Scott Sanders; Martin Cook; Barry Powell; Andy Boon; Faye Elliott; Floor de Kort; Margaret A Knowles; D Timothy Bishop; Julia Newton-Bishop Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-11-03 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Bonnie E Gould Rothberg; Aaron J Berger; Annette M Molinaro; Antonio Subtil; Michael O Krauthammer; Robert L Camp; William R Bradley; Stephan Ariyan; Harriet M Kluger; David L Rimm Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-11-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Harriet M Kluger; Kathleen Hoyt; Antonella Bacchiocchi; Tina Mayer; Jonathan Kirsch; Yuval Kluger; Mario Sznol; Stephan Ariyan; Annette Molinaro; Ruth Halaban Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-04-12 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Emanuelle M Rizk; Angelina M Seffens; Megan H Trager; Michael R Moore; Larisa J Geskin; Robyn D Gartrell-Corrado; Winston Wong; Yvonne M Saenger Journal: Am J Clin Dermatol Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 7.403
Authors: Jacob S Ankeny; Brian Labadie; Jason Luke; Eddy Hsueh; Jane Messina; Jonathan S Zager Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis Date: 2018-05-02 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: A Mitra; C Conway; C Walker; M Cook; B Powell; S Lobo; M Chan; M Kissin; G Layer; J Smallwood; C Ottensmeier; P Stanley; H Peach; H Chong; F Elliott; M M Iles; J Nsengimana; J H Barrett; D T Bishop; J A Newton-Bishop Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-09-21 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Mohammed Kashani-Sabet; Suraj Venna; Mehdi Nosrati; Javier Rangel; Antje Sucker; Friederike Egberts; Frederick L Baehner; Jeff Simko; Stanley P L Leong; Chris Haqq; Axel Hauschild; Dirk Schadendorf; James R Miller; Richard W Sagebiel Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-11-03 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Ingeborg M Bachmann; Rita G Ladstein; Oddbjørn Straume; George N Naumov; Lars A Akslen Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2008-12-05 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: H Gogas; A M M Eggermont; A Hauschild; P Hersey; P Mohr; D Schadendorf; A Spatz; R Dummer Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 32.976