Literature DB >> 18022625

Implications of incorrect determination of fetal sex by ultrasound.

Chibuike Ogwuegbu Chigbu1, Boniface Odugu, Obioma Okezie.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the experiences of women following incorrect determination of fetal sex by ultrasound.
METHOD: A 3-year prospective cohort study of 102 women with discordance between fetal sex determined by ultrasound scan and birth sex. Participants were interviewed using 2 structured pretested questionnaires. The first questionnaire was undertaken within 24 h of delivery. The women were followed up with a second questionnaire 6-9 months later. In-depth interviews were also carried out at this time.
RESULTS: Women who had received an incorrect determination of fetal sex by ultrasound experienced marital conflicts, domestic violence, negative perceptions of ultrasound, and a desire for reversal of tubal ligation.
CONCLUSION: Incorrect determination of fetal sex by ultrasound has implications that can affect the mental and psychological health of the mother and the upbringing of the newborn.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18022625     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.09.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  7 in total

Review 1.  Clinical spectrum of female genital malformations in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Michael R Mallmann; Ulrich Gembruch
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Community survey on awareness and use of obstetric ultrasonography in rural Sarlahi District, Nepal.

Authors:  Naoko Kozuki; Joanne Katz; Subarna K Khatry; James M Tielsch; Steven C LeClerq; Luke C Mullany
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.561

3.  Refugee and migrant women's views of antenatal ultrasound on the Thai Burmese border: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Marcus J Rijken; Mary Ellen Gilder; May Myo Thwin; Honey Moon Ladda Kajeechewa; Jacher Wiladphaingern; Khin Maung Lwin; Caroline Jones; François Nosten; Rose McGready
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Attitude of expectant mothers on the use of ultrasound in pregnancy in a tertiary institution in South East of Nigeria.

Authors:  Lc Ikeako; Hu Ezegwui; E Onwudiwe; Jo Enwereji
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2014-11

5.  Teaching obstetric ultrasound at Mulago Hospital - Kampala, Uganda.

Authors:  Homa Ahmadzia; Sarah Cigna; Imelda Namagembe; Charles Macri; France Galerneau; Urania Magriples
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 0.927

Review 6.  Obstetric ultrasound use in low and middle income countries: a narrative review.

Authors:  Eunsoo Timothy Kim; Kavita Singh; Allisyn Moran; Deborah Armbruster; Naoko Kozuki
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.223

7.  Reasons for disclosure of gender to pregnant women during prenatal ultrasonography.

Authors:  Shazia Shukar-Ud-Din; Fareeha Ubaid; Erum Shahani; Farah Saleh
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2013-12-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.