Literature DB >> 18019464

Computer-assisted hip resurfacing surgery using the acrobot navigation system.

A R W Barrett1, B L Davies, M P S F Gomes, S J Harris, J Henckel, M Jakopec, V Kannan, F M Rodriguez y Baena, J P Cobb.   

Abstract

The authors have previously reported on the laboratory development of the Acrobot Navigation System for accurate computer-assisted hip resurfacing surgery. This paper describes the findings of using the system in the clinical setting and including the improvements that have been made to expedite the procedure. The aim of the present system is to allow accurate planning of the procedure and precise placement of the prosthesis in accordance with the plan, with a zero intraoperative time penalty in comparison to the standard non-navigated technique. At present the navigation system is undergoing final clinical evaluation prior to a clinical study designed to demonstrate the accuracy of outcome compared with the conventional technique. While full results are not yet available, this paper describes the techniques that will be used to evaluate accuracy by comparing pre-operative computed tomography (CT)-based plans with post-operative CT scans. Example qualitative clinical results are included based on visual comparison of the plan with post-operative X-rays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18019464     DOI: 10.1243/09544119JEIM283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H        ISSN: 0954-4119            Impact factor:   1.617


  9 in total

1.  [Imageless computer navigation of hip resurfacing arthroplasty].

Authors:  Christoph Schnurr; Jochen Nessler; Jürgen Koebke; Joern William Michael; Peer Eysel; Dietmar Pierre König
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  Component alignment in hip resurfacing using computer navigation.

Authors:  Chris Bailey; Rehan Gul; Mark Falworth; Steven Zadow; Roger Oakeshott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  A local reference frame for describing the proximal human femur: application in clinical settings.

Authors:  Milad Masjedi; Charison Tay; Simon J Harris; Justin P Cobb
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Computer-assisted hip resurfacing planning using Lie group shape models.

Authors:  Mohamed S Hefny; John F Rudan; Randy E Ellis
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Accuracy of computer-assisted navigation for femoral head resurfacing decreases in hips with abnormal anatomy.

Authors:  Rocco P Pitto; Sharif Malak; Iain A Anderson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Accuracy of a computer-assisted navigation system in resurfacing hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R P Pitto; S Malak; I A Anderson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  The Evolution of Computer-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty and Relevant Applications.

Authors:  Jun-Dong Chang; In-Sung Kim; Atul M Bhardwaj; Ramachandra N Badami
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2017-03-06

8.  Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty vs Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Nationwide Database Study.

Authors:  Sione A Ofa; Bailey J Ross; Travis R Flick; Akshar H Patel; William F Sherman
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-11-07

Review 9.  Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery and robotic surgery in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2013-02-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.