Literature DB >> 18006918

Neighborhood-level socioeconomic predictors of nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines.

Amy B Dailey1, Stanislav V Kasl, Theodore R Holford, Lisa Calvocoressi, Beth A Jones.   

Abstract

As neighborhood context is increasingly recognized as an important predictor of health outcomes and health behaviors, this analysis sought to determine the relationship between neighborhood-level socioeconomic status (SES) and regular mammography screening behavior. One thousand four hundred fifty-one women ages 40 to 79 years who obtained an "index" screening mammogram at one of five urban hospitals in Connecticut between October 1996 and January 1998 were enrolled in this prospective study. The logistic regression analysis includes the 1,229 women [484 African-American (39%) and 745 White (61%)] who completed telephone interviews at baseline and follow-up (average 29.4 months later) and for whom the study outcome, nonadherence to age-specific mammography screening guidelines, was ascertained. Neighborhood-level SES was determined using 1990 census tract information. Neighborhood-level SES variables (quartiles) were associated with nonadherence for African-American women [neighborhood-level education and composite socioeconomic position index (SEP Index)] and White women (neighborhood-level crowding and neighborhood-level assets). Using race-specific categorizations reflective of individual-level SES distributions, the SEP Index and neighborhood-level education were associated with nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines for African-American women (marginally significant for White women), independent of individual-level SES and other known predictors of mammography screening use [African-American women: SEP Index odds ratio (OR), 3.55; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.33-9.51; neighborhood-level education OR, 3.21; 95% CI, 1.25-8.26; White women: SEP Index OR, 2.13; 95% CI, 0.97-4.67; neighborhood-level education OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 0.93-5.76]. The results of this analysis underscore the importance of examining neighborhood social context as well as individual factors in the study of mammography screening behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18006918     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-1076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  37 in total

1.  State-based estimates of mammography screening rates based on information from two health surveys.

Authors:  William W Davis; Van L Parsons; Dawei Xie; Nathaniel Schenker; Machell Town; Trivellore E Raghunathan; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Changes in breast cancer risk distribution among Vermont women using screening mammography.

Authors:  Kenyon C Bolton; John L Mace; Pamela M Vacek; Sally D Herschorn; Ted A James; Jeffrey A Tice; Karla Kerlikowske; Berta M Geller; Donald L Weaver; Brian L Sprague
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Neighborhood Predictors of Mammography Barriers Among US-Based Latinas.

Authors:  Yamile Molina; Jesse J Plascak; Donald L Patrick; Sonia Bishop; Gloria D Coronado; Shirley A A Beresford
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2016-04-08

4.  Socioeconomic status as determinant for participation in mammography screening: assessing the difference between using women's own versus their partner's.

Authors:  Malin Kjellén; My von Euler-Chelpin
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 3.380

5.  Statistical Assessment of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Deprivation Environment in Spatial Epidemiologic Studies.

Authors:  Min Lian; James Struthers; Ying Liu
Journal:  Open J Stat       Date:  2016-06-14

Review 6.  Factors in quality care--the case of follow-up to abnormal cancer screening tests--problems in the steps and interfaces of care.

Authors:  Jane Zapka; Stephen H Taplin; Rebecca Anhang Price; Caroline Cranos; Robin Yabroff
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

7.  Remake Rates for Single-Unit Crowns in Clinical Practice: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Michael S McCracken; Mark S Litaker; Valeria V Gordan; Thomas Karr; Ellen Sowell; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Racial and geographic differences in mammography screening in St. Louis City: a multilevel study.

Authors:  Min Lian; Donna B Jeffe; Mario Schootman
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 3.671

9.  Reducing racial and ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer screening is likely to require more than access to care.

Authors:  Jim P Stimpson; José A Pagán; Li-Wu Chen
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.301

10.  Inequalities in colorectal cancer screening participation in the first round of the national screening programme in England.

Authors:  C von Wagner; A Good; D Wright; B Rachet; A Obichere; S Bloom; J Wardle
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.