Literature DB >> 18006594

Quantitative PET comparing gated with nongated acquisitions using a NEMA phantom with respiratory-simulated motion.

Douglass C Vines1, Harald Keller, Jeremy D P Hoisak, Stephen L Breen.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This study evaluated the use of gated versus nongated PET acquisitions for absolute quantification of radioisotope concentration (RC) in a respiratory motion-simulated moving phantom filled with radioactive spheres and background for both 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) acquisitions.
METHODS: An image-quality phantom with all 6 spheres filled with the same (18)F RC (range, 19-62 kBq/mL) was scanned with PET/CT at rest and in motion with and without gating. The background was filled with (18)F solution to yield sphere-to-background ratios of approximately 5, 10, 15, and 20 to 1. Both 2D and 3D acquisitions were used for all combinations. Respiratory motion was simulated by using a motor-driven plastic platform to move the phantom periodically with a displacement of 2 cm and a cycle time of 5.8 s. For gated acquisitions, the phantom was tracked using a real-time position management system. Images were reconstructed, and regions of interest with the same sizes as the actual spheres were manually placed on axial slices to determine maximum and mean pixel RC. A threshold method (70% and 94% for 2D and 3D modes) was also used to determine a mean voxel RC. All values were compared with the expected RC; percentage differences were calculated for each sphere. To reduce partial-volume effects, only data for the 4 largest spheres were analyzed.
RESULTS: The mean pixel method was the only method with linear responses for all 3 scan types, enabling direct comparisons. The ranges of RC percentage differences were underestimated for all scan types (using the mean pixel method). The overall mean percentage differences were 37, 49, and 41 in 2D mode and 40, 51, and 41 in 3D mode for static, nongated, and gated acquisitions, respectively. Gated acquisitions improved quantification (by reducing underestimation) over nongated acquisitions by 8% and 10% for 2D and 3D modes.
CONCLUSION: In the presence of motion, the use of gated PET acquisitions appears to improve quantification accuracy over nongated acquisitions, almost restoring the results to those observed when the phantom is static.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18006594     DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.107.040782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol        ISSN: 0091-4916


  4 in total

Review 1.  Respiratory and cardiac motion correction with 4D PET imaging: shooting at moving targets.

Authors:  Giovanni Lucignani
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Optimal gating compared to 3D and 4D PET reconstruction for characterization of lung tumours.

Authors:  Wouter van Elmpt; James Hamill; Judson Jones; Dirk De Ruysscher; Philippe Lambin; Michel Ollers
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Cardiac motion compensation and resolution modeling in simultaneous PET-MR: a cardiac lesion detection study.

Authors:  Y Petibon; J Ouyang; X Zhu; C Huang; T G Reese; S Y Chun; Q Li; G El Fakhri
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  4D-CT Attenuation Correction in Respiratory-Gated PET for Hypoxia Imaging: Is It Really Beneficial?

Authors:  Brandon Driscoll; Douglass Vines; Tina Shek; Julia Publicover; Ivan Yeung; Stephen Breen; David Jaffray
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2020-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.