Literature DB >> 18006012

In vivo efficacy of laparoscopic assisted percutaneous renal cryotherapy: evidence based guidelines for the practicing urologist.

Alberto Breda1, John S Lam, Stephen Riggs, John T Leppert, Dorina Gui, Jonathan W Said, Peter G Schulam, Arie S Belldegrun.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The treatment of small renal tumors continues to evolve in parallel with advances in ablative technology. We compared the lesion geometry of 3, 17 gauge cryoneedles to determine the most effective distance and configuration of the cryoneedles in an in vivo porcine kidney model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Argon gas based renal cryoablation was performed in 6 pigs using a laparoscopically assisted percutaneous approach. Cryoablation using a single cryoneedle and a template of 3 cryoneedles with various ice ball shapes, including elliptical, bulb-shaped and standard 17 gauge cryoneedles (Galil Medical, Plymouth Meadow, Pennsylvania) was performed in 3 pigs. Three additional pigs underwent renal cryoablation using elliptical cryoneedles in 3 triangular template configurations with the cryoneedles spaced 1, 1.5 and 2 cm apart, respectively. The animals were sacrificed a minimum of 2 weeks following treatment.
RESULTS: Elliptical cryoneedles achieved the largest area of necrosis when used in single and template configurations. When used in a template configuration of 3 needles 1, 1.5 and 2 cm apart from each other the calculated volume of necrosis was 4.3 x 4.5 x 2.5, 4.9 x 4.1 x 2.5 and 4.0 x 4.5 x 2.5 cm, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Using a single 17 gauge cryoneedle is inadequate for treating most small renal tumors. Cryoneedles with an elliptical ice ball are most effective for achieving consistent and reliable tissue destruction. The 1.5 cm template configuration generated the largest area of necrosis. Our data suggest that with the current technology renal cryoablation should be limited to lesions not greater than 4 cm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18006012     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Lower pole calyceal stones].

Authors:  U Nagele; T Knoll; D Schilling; M S Michel; A Stenzl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Are multiple cryoprobes additive or synergistic in renal cryotherapy?

Authors:  Jennifer L Young; David W McCormick; Surrendra B Kolla; Petros G Sountoulides; Oskar G Kaufmann; Cervando G Ortiz-Vanderdys; Victor B Huynh; Adam G Kaplan; Nick S Jain; Donald L Pick; Lorena A Andrade; Kathryn E Osann; Elspeth M McDougall; Ralph V Clayman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Multipoint Thermal Sensors Associated with Improved Oncologic Outcomes Following Cryoablation.

Authors:  Jeremy W Martin; Roshan M Patel; Zhamshid Okhunov; Aashay Vyas; Duane Vajgrt; Ralph V Clayman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Kidney cancer focal cryoablation trend: does location or approach matter?

Authors:  O Rodriguez Faba; F Sanguedolce; P Grange; G Kooiman; A Bakavicius; P De la Torre; J Palou
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Renal cryoablation - a practical guide for interventional radiologists.

Authors:  Matthew Seager; Shankar Kumar; Emma Lim; Graham Munneke; Steve Bandula; Miles Walkden
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Management of small renal masses--update 2011.

Authors:  C Surcel; C Mirvald; C Gingu; R Stoica; I Sinescu
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2011-05-25

7.  Factors Affecting Lethal Isotherms During Cryoablation Procedures.

Authors:  Andrew C Rau; Ryan Siskey; Jorge A Ochoa; Tracy Good
Journal:  Open Biomed Eng J       Date:  2016-06-29

8.  Modeling Cryotherapy Ice Ball Dimensions and Isotherms in a Novel Gel-based Model to Determine Optimal Cryo-needle Configurations and Settings for Potential Use in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Taimur T Shah; Uri Arbel; Sonja Foss; Andrew Zachman; Simon Rodney; Hashim U Ahmed; Manit Arya
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 2.649

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.