Literature DB >> 18005282

A study of dentists' preferred maxillary anterior tooth width proportions: comparing the recurring esthetic dental proportion to other mathematical and naturally occurring proportions.

Daniel H Ward1.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: Presently, there are no generally accepted standards for designing smiles using tooth proportion relationships.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether North American dentists prefer smile designs created using the recurring esthetic dental (RED) proportion, other mathematically defined tooth proportion relationships, or naturally occurring tooth-to-tooth width proportions previously reported to occur in the North American population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred and one North American dentists were surveyed to determine their preferences of imaged smiles exhibiting different anterior tooth width proportions and the primary proportion influencing their decision. One-sample t-tests were used to compare preferences of constructed smiles. Pearson's Chi-square test was used to assess the independence of the relationship between the subjects' demographic attributes and the factors reported as being instrumental in their decision processes.
RESULTS: Fifty-seven percent of dentists surveyed preferred the smiles with the 70% RED proportion over the smiles with the naturally occurring maxillary anterior tooth width proportions in normal-length teeth. Dentists preferred the smiles of the naturally occurring maxillary tooth proportions (70%) and the 70% RED proportion (75%) over the golden proportion. In smiles with tall teeth, the golden proportion was preferred by 58% of the surveyed dentists over the naturally occurring tooth-to-tooth width proportions as previously defined by Preston. Sixty-two percent of dentists cited the overall balance as the primary factor affecting their selection. Twenty-three percent made their selection based on the size of the maxillary central incisors, whereas 15% used other teeth or factors.
CONCLUSION: Smiles created using the principles of the RED proportion were preferred by a majority of dentists surveyed. The majority of dentists reported that overall balance was the primary factor affecting their selection. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The RED proportion may be useful in creating smiles preferred by North American dentists. Seventy-five percent of North American dentists preferred using the RED proportion when designing smiles with normal-length teeth over using the golden proportion, which has been a pseudostandard in esthetic dentistry. Applying the golden proportion universally in smile design should be reconsidered as it was found to be the least pleasing and accepted in this study for normal-length teeth.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18005282     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00114.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Esthet Restor Dent        ISSN: 1496-4155            Impact factor:   2.843


  10 in total

1.  Does the gender of the subject affect perceived smile aesthetics when varying the dimensions of maxillary lateral incisors?

Authors:  D Tan; R Playle; A Harris; C Tredwin; L Addy
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Upper anterior tooth dimensions in a young-adult Indian population in the UK: implications for aesthetic dentistry.

Authors:  T B Shetty; F Beyuo; N H F Wilson
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  An evaluation of the influence of teeth and the labial soft tissues on the perceived aesthetics of a smile.

Authors:  M Y S Chan; S B Mehta; S Banerji
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Perception of Acceptable Range of Smiles by Specialists, General Dentists and Lay Persons and Evaluation of Different Aesthetic Paradigms.

Authors:  Mainak Kanti Saha; Margie Khatri; Suparna Ganguly Saha; Sandeep Dubey; Divya Saxena; Neelam Vijaywargiya; Shubham Kala
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-02-01

5.  To evaluate the validity of Recurring Esthetic Dental proportion in natural dentition.

Authors:  Shilpa Shetty; Varun Pitti; Cl Satish Babu; Gp Surendra Kumar; Kr Jnanadev
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2011-07

6.  Evaluation of "Golden Proportion" in Saudi individuals with natural smiles.

Authors:  Amal Ali Swelem; Eman MohamedZaghloul Al-Rafah
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2019-01-29

7.  Revisiting the Maxillary Teeth in 384 Subjects Reveals A Deviation From the Classical Aesthetic Dimensions.

Authors:  María Melo; Fadi Ata-Ali; Julia Huertas; Teresa Cobo; Jamil Awad Shibli; Pablo Galindo-Moreno; Javier Ata-Ali
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Evaluation of maxillary anterior teeth proportion with Chu's Gauge in a population of Central India: an in vivo study.

Authors:  Sukhada Arun Wagh; Sneha S Mantri; Abhilasha Bhasin
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2020-01-31

9.  Smile esthetics from odontology students' perspectives.

Authors:  Pilar España; Beatriz Tarazona; Vanessa Paredes
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Golden Standard and Golden Proportion of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Among Saudi Population in Makkah.

Authors:  Mohamed Fattouh Abdallah; Omer H Alamoudi; Abdullah Muneer Ali; Raian A Marzogi; Mohammed A Bafaraj; Wahdan Mohammed Abdelghany Elkwatehy
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2021-06-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.