BACKGROUND: Clinical trials to assess interventions for mobility disability are critically needed; however, data for efficiently designing such trials are lacking. METHODS: Results are described from a pilot clinical trial in which 424 volunteers aged 70-89 years were randomly assigned to one of two interventions-physical activity or a healthy aging education program-and followed for a planned minimum of 12 months. We evaluated the longitudinal distributions of four standardized outcomes to contrast how they may serve as primary outcomes of future clinical trials: ability to walk 400 meters, ability to walk 4 meters in < or =10 seconds, a physical performance battery, and a questionnaire focused on physical function. RESULTS: Changes in all four outcomes were interrelated over time. The ability to walk 400 meters as a dichotomous outcome provided the smallest sample size projections (i.e., appeared to be the most efficient outcome). It loaded most heavily on the underlying latent variable in structural equation modeling with a weight of 80%. A 4-year trial based on the outcome of the 400-meter walk is projected to require N = 962-2234 to detect an intervention effect of 30%-20% with 90% power. CONCLUSIONS: Future clinical trials of interventions designed to influence mobility disability may have greater efficiency if they adopt the ability to complete a 400-meter walk as their primary outcome.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Clinical trials to assess interventions for mobility disability are critically needed; however, data for efficiently designing such trials are lacking. METHODS: Results are described from a pilot clinical trial in which 424 volunteers aged 70-89 years were randomly assigned to one of two interventions-physical activity or a healthy aging education program-and followed for a planned minimum of 12 months. We evaluated the longitudinal distributions of four standardized outcomes to contrast how they may serve as primary outcomes of future clinical trials: ability to walk 400 meters, ability to walk 4 meters in < or =10 seconds, a physical performance battery, and a questionnaire focused on physical function. RESULTS: Changes in all four outcomes were interrelated over time. The ability to walk 400 meters as a dichotomous outcome provided the smallest sample size projections (i.e., appeared to be the most efficient outcome). It loaded most heavily on the underlying latent variable in structural equation modeling with a weight of 80%. A 4-year trial based on the outcome of the 400-meter walk is projected to require N = 962-2234 to detect an intervention effect of 30%-20% with 90% power. CONCLUSIONS: Future clinical trials of interventions designed to influence mobility disability may have greater efficiency if they adopt the ability to complete a 400-meter walk as their primary outcome.
Authors: Marco Pahor; Steven N Blair; Mark Espeland; Roger Fielding; Thomas M Gill; Jack M Guralnik; Evan C Hadley; Abby C King; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Cinzia Maraldi; Michael E Miller; Anne B Newman; Walter J Rejeski; Sergei Romashkan; Stephanie Studenski Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Stephen P Messier; Richard F Loeser; Gary D Miller; Timothy M Morgan; W Jack Rejeski; Mary Ann Sevick; Walter H Ettinger; Marco Pahor; Jeff D Williamson Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2004-05
Authors: Miriam E Nelson; Jennifer E Layne; Melissa J Bernstein; Andrea Nuernberger; Carmen Castaneda; David Kaliton; Jeffrey Hausdorff; James O Judge; David M Buchner; Ronenn Roubenoff; Maria A Fiatarone Singh Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Luigi Ferrucci; Jack M Guralnik; Stephanie Studenski; Linda P Fried; Gordon B Cutler; Jeremy D Walston Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Anne B Newman; Catherine L Haggerty; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Michael C Nevitt; Eleanor M Simonsick Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Yves M Rolland; Matteo Cesari; Michael E Miller; Brenda W Penninx; Hal H Atkinson; Marco Pahor Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Christy S Carter; Emanuele Marzetti; Christiaan Leeuwenburgh; Todd Manini; Thomas C Foster; Leanne Groban; Philip J Scarpace; Drake Morgan Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2011-06-02 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Aron S Buchman; Patricia A Boyle; Sue E Leurgans; Lisa L Barnes; David A Bennett Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: David X Marquez; JoEllen Wilbur; Susan L Hughes; Michael L Berbaum; Robert S Wilson; David M Buchner; Edward McAuley Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2014-06-24 Impact factor: 2.226