OBJECTIVES: To measure the prevalence of limited functional health literacy in the UK, and examine associations with health behaviours and self-rated health. DESIGN: Psychometric testing using a British version of the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA) in a population sample of adults. SETTING: UK-wide interview survey (excluding Northern Ireland and the Scottish Isles). PARTICIPANTS: 759 adults (439 women, 320 men) aged 18-90 years (mean age _ 47.6 years) selected using random location sampling. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional health literacy, self-rated health, fruit and vegetable consumption, physical exercise and smoking. RESULTS: We found that 11.4% of participants had either marginal or inadequate health literacy. Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that the risk of having limitations in health literacy increased with age (adjusted odds ratio 1.04; 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.06), being male (odds ratio _ 2.04; 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 3.55), low educational attainment (odds ratio _ 7.46; 95% confidence interval 3.35 to 16.58) and low income (odds ratio _ 5.94; 95% confidence interval 1.87 to 18.89). In a second multivariable logistic regression analysis, every point higher on the health literacy scale increased the likelihood of eating at least five portions of fruit and vegetables a day (odds ratio _ 1.02; 95% confidence interval 1.003 to 1.03), being a non-smoker (odds ratio _ 1.02; 95% confidence interval 1.0003 to 1.03) and having good self-rated health (odds ratio _ 1.02; 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.04), independently of age, education, gender, ethnicity and income. CONCLUSIONS: The results encourage efforts to monitor health literacy in the British population and examine associations with engagement with preventative health behaviours.
OBJECTIVES: To measure the prevalence of limited functional health literacy in the UK, and examine associations with health behaviours and self-rated health. DESIGN: Psychometric testing using a British version of the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA) in a population sample of adults. SETTING: UK-wide interview survey (excluding Northern Ireland and the Scottish Isles). PARTICIPANTS: 759 adults (439 women, 320 men) aged 18-90 years (mean age _ 47.6 years) selected using random location sampling. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional health literacy, self-rated health, fruit and vegetable consumption, physical exercise and smoking. RESULTS: We found that 11.4% of participants had either marginal or inadequate health literacy. Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that the risk of having limitations in health literacy increased with age (adjusted odds ratio 1.04; 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.06), being male (odds ratio _ 2.04; 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 3.55), low educational attainment (odds ratio _ 7.46; 95% confidence interval 3.35 to 16.58) and low income (odds ratio _ 5.94; 95% confidence interval 1.87 to 18.89). In a second multivariable logistic regression analysis, every point higher on the health literacy scale increased the likelihood of eating at least five portions of fruit and vegetables a day (odds ratio _ 1.02; 95% confidence interval 1.003 to 1.03), being a non-smoker (odds ratio _ 1.02; 95% confidence interval 1.0003 to 1.03) and having good self-rated health (odds ratio _ 1.02; 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.04), independently of age, education, gender, ethnicity and income. CONCLUSIONS: The results encourage efforts to monitor health literacy in the British population and examine associations with engagement with preventative health behaviours.
Authors: Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Ruth M Parker; Julie A Gazmararian; Lynn T Nielsen-Bohlman; Rima R Rudd Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Barry D Weiss; Mary Z Mays; William Martz; Kelley Merriam Castro; Darren A DeWalt; Michael P Pignone; Joy Mockbee; Frank A Hale Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2005 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: J A Gazmararian; D W Baker; M V Williams; R M Parker; T L Scott; D C Green; S N Fehrenbach; J Ren; J P Koplan Journal: JAMA Date: 1999-02-10 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ashli A Owen-Smith; David H Smith; Cynthia S Rand; Jeffrey O Tom; Reesa Laws; Amy Waterbury; Andrew Williams; William M Vollmer Journal: Perm J Date: 2016-06-29
Authors: John L Oliffe; Emma Rossnagel; Mary T Kelly; Joan L Bottorff; Cherisse Seaton; Francine Darroch Journal: Health Promot Int Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 2.483
Authors: Kelvin Koay; Penelope Schofield; Karla Gough; Rachelle Buchbinder; Danny Rischin; David Ball; June Corry; Richard H Osborne; Michael Jefford Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-03-19 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Diana Stewart Hoover; Jennifer I Vidrine; Sanjay Shete; Claire A Spears; Miguel A Cano; Virmarie Correa-Fernández; David W Wetter; Lorna H McNeill Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2015