Literature DB >> 17997674

Perceptual reversals need no prompting by attention.

Alexander Pastukhov1, Jochen Braun.   

Abstract

Many ambiguous patterns elicit spontaneous alternations of phenomenal appearance. Attention is known to influence these phenomenal reversals, as do several other factors. We asked whether a shift of attention individually prompts each reversal of phenomenal appearance. By combining intermittent presentation with a proven method of attention control, we monitored phenomenal alternations in the complete absence of attention shifts. We found that reversals become less frequent but continue even when observers neither report on nor shift attention to an ambiguous pattern. The statistical variability of reversals remains unaffected. We conclude that reversals of phenomenal appearance are not prompted externally by attention shifts, but internally by an intrinsic instability of the neural representation of ambiguous patterns.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17997674     DOI: 10.1167/7.10.5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  17 in total

Review 1.  United we sense, divided we fail: context-driven perception of ambiguous visual stimuli.

Authors:  P C Klink; R J A van Wezel; R van Ee
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Opposing effects of attention and consciousness on afterimages.

Authors:  Jeroen J A van Boxtel; Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Christof Koch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The role of frontal and parietal brain areas in bistable perception.

Authors:  Tomas Knapen; Jan Brascamp; Joel Pearson; Raymond van Ee; Randolph Blake
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Attention model of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Hsin-Hung Li; James Rankin; John Rinzel; Marisa Carrasco; David J Heeger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Does visual attention drive the dynamics of bistable perception?

Authors:  Kevin C Dieter; Jan Brascamp; Duje Tadin; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Bistable perception modeled as competing stochastic integrations at two levels.

Authors:  Guido Gigante; Maurizio Mattia; Jochen Braun; Paolo Del Giudice
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Opposite neural signatures of motion-induced blindness in human dorsal and ventral visual cortex.

Authors:  Tobias H Donner; Dov Sagi; Yoram S Bonneh; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Interaction of perceptual grouping and crossmodal temporal capture in tactile apparent-motion.

Authors:  Lihan Chen; Zhuanghua Shi; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Binocular rivalry reveals an out-of-equilibrium neural dynamics suited for decision-making.

Authors:  Maurizio Mattia; Jochen Braun; Robin Cao; Alexander Pastukhov; Stepan Aleshin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Multi-stable perception balances stability and sensitivity.

Authors:  Alexander Pastukhov; Pedro E García-Rodríguez; Joachim Haenicke; Antoni Guillamon; Gustavo Deco; Jochen Braun
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.