Literature DB >> 17997630

Effect of spatial distance to the task stimulus on task-irrelevant perceptual learning of static Gabors.

Shigeaki Nishina1, Aaron R Seitz, Mitsuo Kawato, Takeo Watanabe.   

Abstract

It was previously shown that sensitivity improvements to a task-irrelevant motion direction can be obtained when it is presented in concurrence with observers' performance of an attended task (A. R. Seitz & T. Watanabe, 2003; T. Watanabe, J. E. Náñez, & Y. Sasaki, 2001). To test whether this task-irrelevant perceptual learning (TIPL) is specific for motion and to clarify the relationships between the observer's task and the resultant TIPL, we investigated the spatial profile of the sensitivity enhancement for a static task-irrelevant feature. During the training period, participants performed an attentionally demanding character identification task at one location, whereas subthreshold, static, Gabor patches, which were masked in noise, were presented at different locations in the visual field. Subjects' sensitivity to the Gabors was compared between the pre- and posttraining tests. First, we found that TIPL extends to learning of static visual stimuli. Thus, TIPL is not a specialized process to motion stimuli. As to the effect of spatial location, the largest improvement was found for the Gabors presented in closest proximity to the task. These data indicate that the learning of the task-irrelevant visual feature significantly depends on the task location, with a gradual attenuation according to the spatial distance between them. These findings give further insights into the mechanism of perceptual learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17997630     DOI: 10.1167/7.13.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  23 in total

1.  Pupillometry as a glimpse into the neurochemical basis of human memory encoding.

Authors:  Russell Cohen Hoffing; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Exogenous and endogenous attention during perceptual learning differentially affect post-training target thresholds.

Authors:  Ikuko Mukai; Kandy Bahadur; Kartik Kesavabhotla; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Task-irrelevant learning occurs only when the irrelevant feature is weak.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Tsushima; Aaron R Seitz; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Low-level sensory plasticity during task-irrelevant perceptual learning: evidence from conventional and double training procedures.

Authors:  Praveen K Pilly; Stephen Grossberg; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 5.  Two-stage model in perceptual learning: toward a unified theory.

Authors:  Kazuhisa Shibata; Dov Sagi; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  The therapeutic benefits of perceptual learning.

Authors:  Jenni Deveau; Gary Lovcik; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  Curr Trends Neurol       Date:  2013

Review 7.  The phenomenon of task-irrelevant perceptual learning.

Authors:  Aaron R Seitz; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 8.  Advances in visual perceptual learning and plasticity.

Authors:  Yuka Sasaki; Jose E Nanez; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Rewards evoke learning of unconsciously processed visual stimuli in adult humans.

Authors:  Aaron R Seitz; Dongho Kim; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 10.  Roles of attention in perceptual learning from perspectives of psychophysics and animal learning.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Tsushima; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.