Literature DB >> 24758723

Two-stage model in perceptual learning: toward a unified theory.

Kazuhisa Shibata1, Dov Sagi, Takeo Watanabe.   

Abstract

Training or exposure to a visual feature leads to a long-term improvement in performance on visual tasks that employ this feature. Such performance improvements and the processes that govern them are called visual perceptual learning (VPL). As an ever greater volume of research accumulates in the field, we have reached a point where a unifying model of VPL should be sought. A new wave of research findings has exposed diverging results along three major directions in VPL: specificity versus generalization of VPL, lower versus higher brain locus of VPL, and task-relevant versus task-irrelevant VPL. In this review, we propose a new theoretical model that suggests the involvement of two different stages in VPL: a low-level, stimulus-driven stage, and a higher-level stage dominated by task demands. If experimentally verified, this model would not only constructively unify the current divergent results in the VPL field, but would also lead to a significantly better understanding of visual plasticity, which may, in turn, lead to interventions to ameliorate diseases affecting vision and other pathological or age-related visual and nonvisual declines.
© 2014 New York Academy of Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  perceptual learning; plasticity; two-stage model; vision

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24758723      PMCID: PMC4103699          DOI: 10.1111/nyas.12419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  139 in total

1.  Neural activity in early visual cortex reflects behavioral experience and higher-order perceptual saliency.

Authors:  Tai Sing Lee; Cindy F Yang; Richard D Romero; David Mumford
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  A common framework for perceptual learning.

Authors:  Aaron R Seitz; Hubert R Dinse
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 3.  Improving the performance of the amblyopic visual system.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi; Roger W Li
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Transfer in motion perceptual learning depends on the difficulty of the training task.

Authors:  Xiaoxiao Wang; Yifeng Zhou; Zili Liu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Modeling perceptual learning: difficulties and how they can be overcome.

Authors:  M H Herzog; M Fahle
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  Direction-specific improvement in motion discrimination.

Authors:  K Ball; R Sekuler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Physiological correlates of perceptual learning in monkey V1 and V2.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Ghose; Tianming Yang; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Enhanced memory for scenes presented at behaviorally relevant points in time.

Authors:  Jeffrey Y Lin; Amanda D Pype; Scott O Murray; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Adaptation maintains population homeostasis in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Andrea Benucci; Aman B Saleem; Matteo Carandini
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Task attention facilitates learning of task-irrelevant stimuli.

Authors:  Tsung-Ren Huang; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  22 in total

1.  Rapid and long-lasting reduction of crowding through training.

Authors:  Amit Yashar; Jiageng Chen; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Individual difference predictors of learning and generalization in perceptual learning.

Authors:  Gillian Dale; Aaron Cochrane; C Shawn Green
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Asymmetric perceptual confounds between canonical lightings and materials.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Huib de Ridder; Sylvia C Pont
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  V3A takes over a job of MT+ after training on a visual task.

Authors:  Yuka Sasaki; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Category Learning Stretches Neural Representations in Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Jonathan Folstein; Thomas J Palmeri; Ana E Van Gulick; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-02

6.  Supervised Learning Occurs in Visual Perceptual Learning of Complex Natural Images.

Authors:  Sebastian M Frank; Andrea Qi; Daniela Ravasio; Yuka Sasaki; Eric L Rosen; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Visual Plasticity in Adulthood: Perspectives from Hebbian and Homeostatic Plasticity.

Authors:  Ji Won Bang; Giles Hamilton-Fletcher; Kevin C Chan
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 7.235

8.  Visual learning with reduced adaptation is eccentricity-specific.

Authors:  Hila Harris; Dov Sagi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Rapid and long-lasting learning of feature binding.

Authors:  Amit Yashar; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-06-09

10.  High reward enhances perceptual learning.

Authors:  Pan Zhang; Fang Hou; Fang-Fang Yan; Jie Xi; Bo-Rong Lin; Jin Zhao; Jia Yang; Ge Chen; Meng-Yuan Zhang; Qing He; Barbara Anne Dosher; Zhong-Lin Lu; Chang-Bing Huang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.