Literature DB >> 17997080

A triclosan-ciprofloxacin cross-resistant mutant strain of Staphylococcus aureus displays an alteration in the expression of several cell membrane structural and functional genes.

Olga Tkachenko1, Jessica Shepard, Virginie M Aris, Amy Joy, Anangely Bello, Indira Londono, Jehona Marku, Patricia Soteropoulos, Marcy A Peteroy-Kelly.   

Abstract

Triclosan is an antimicrobial agent found in many consumer products. Triclosan inhibits the bacterial fatty acid biosynthetic enzyme, enoyl-ACP reductase (FabI). Decreased susceptibility to triclosan correlates with ciprofloxacin resistance in several bacteria. In these bacteria, resistance to both drugs maps to genes encoding multi-drug efflux pumps. The focus of this study was to determine whether triclosan resistance contributes to ciprofloxacin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. In S. aureus, triclosan resistance maps to a fabI homolog and ciprofloxacin resistance maps to genes encoding DNA gyrase, topoisomerase IV and to the multi-drug efflux pump, NorA. Using a norA overexpressing mutant, we demonstrated that upregulation of NorA does not lead to triclosan resistance. To further investigate triclosan/ciprofloxacin resistance in S. aureus, we isolated triclosan/ciprofloxacin-resistant mutants. The mutants were screened for mutations in the genes encoding the targets of triclosan and ciprofloxacin. One mutant, JJ5, was wild-type for all sequences analyzed. We next monitored the efflux of triclosan from JJ5 and determined that triclosan resistance in the mutant was not due to active efflux of the drug. Finally, gene expression profiling demonstrated that an alteration in cell membrane structural and functional gene expression is likely responsible for triclosan and ciprofloxacin resistance in JJ5.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17997080     DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2007.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Microbiol        ISSN: 0923-2508            Impact factor:   3.992


  13 in total

1.  The frequency of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in homes differing in their use of surface antibacterial agents.

Authors:  Bonnie M Marshall; Eduardo Robleto; Theresa Dumont; Stuart B Levy
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 2.  Occurrence and toxicity of antimicrobial triclosan and by-products in the environment.

Authors:  Gilles Bedoux; Benoit Roig; Olivier Thomas; Virginie Dupont; Barbara Le Bot
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  Antimicrobial sutures and prevention of surgical site infection: assessment of the safety of the antiseptic triclosan.

Authors:  David Leaper; Ojan Assadian; Nils-Olaf Hubner; Andrew McBain; Thomas Barbolt; Stephen Rothenburger; Peter Wilson
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 4.  Biologia Futura: use of biocides during COVID-19-global reshuffling of the microbiota.

Authors:  Debarati Paul; Suresh K Mondal; Santi M Mandal
Journal:  Biol Futur       Date:  2021-02-01

5.  Enhanced Biosynthesis of Fatty Acids Contributes to Ciprofloxacin Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Yu-Bin Su; Xi-Kang Tang; Ling-Ping Zhu; Ke-Xin Yang; Li Pan; Hui Li; Zhuang-Gui Chen
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 6.064

6.  Mutations upstream of fabI in triclosan resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains are associated with elevated fabI gene expression.

Authors:  Denis Grandgirard; Leonardo Furi; Maria Laura Ciusa; Lucilla Baldassarri; Daniel R Knight; Ian Morrissey; Carlo R Largiadèr; Stephen L Leib; Marco R Oggioni
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Antimicrobial Chemicals Associate with Microbial Function and Antibiotic Resistance Indoors.

Authors:  Ashkaan K Fahimipour; Sarah Ben Mamaar; Alexander G McFarland; Ryan A Blaustein; Jing Chen; Adam J Glawe; Jeff Kline; Jessica L Green; Rolf U Halden; Kevin Van Den Wymelenberg; Curtis Huttenhower; Erica M Hartmann
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 6.496

8.  Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated in 1965 are more susceptible to triclosan than current isolates.

Authors:  Sissel Skovgaard; Lene Nørby Nielsen; Marianne Halberg Larsen; Robert Leo Skov; Hanne Ingmer; Henrik Westh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Staphylococcus aureus but not Listeria monocytogenes adapt to triclosan and adaptation correlates with increased fabI expression and agr deficiency.

Authors:  Lene Nørby Nielsen; Marianne Halberg Larsen; Sissel Skovgaard; Vicky Kastbjerg; Henrik Westh; Lone Gram; Hanne Ingmer
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  The impact of triclosan on the spread of antibiotic resistance in the environment.

Authors:  Daniel E Carey; Patrick J McNamara
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.