Literature DB >> 17996512

Impact of 64-slice cardiac computed tomographic angiography on clinical decision-making in emergency department patients with chest pain of possible myocardial ischemic origin.

Ronen Rubinshtein1, David A Halon, Tamar Gaspar, Ronen Jaffe, Jacob Goldstein, Basheer Karkabi, Moshe Y Flugelman, Asia Kogan, Reuma Shapira, Nathan Peled, Basil S Lewis.   

Abstract

To examine the impact of contrast enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) on clinical decision-making in patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain of possible ischemic origin, we studied 58 consecutive patients (age 56 +/- 10 years, 36% female) with chest pain, intermediate risk, and no ischemic electrocardiographic changes or increased biomarker measurements. After standard ED patient assessment including cardiology consultation, a diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome was made in 41 patients (71%), hospitalization was recommended in 47 (81%), and 32 (55%) were scheduled for an early invasive strategy. Patients underwent 64-slice contrast agent-enhanced MDCT with image reconstruction in multiple formats using retrospective electrocardiographic gating, which revealed normal (no or trivial atheroma) coronary vasculature in 15 patients, nonobstructive atheroma in 20 patients, and obstructive coronary disease (> or =1 luminal narrowing of > or =50%) in 23 patients. After MDCT, the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome was revised in 18 of 41 patients (44%; 16 normal MDCT/widely patent stents, 2 alternative diagnoses), planned hospitalization canceled in 21 of 47 patients (45%; 13 normal MDCT/patent stent, 8 minor branch vessel disease), and planned early invasive strategy altered in 25 of 58 patients (43%; unnecessary in 20 of 32, advisable in 5 of 26 others). Effect of MDCT on clinical decisions was greater in the 36 patients without known preceding coronary disease. In 32 patients discharged from the ED (11 after initial triage, 21 patients after MDCT), there were no major adverse cardiac events (e.g., death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization) during a 12-month follow-up period. In conclusion, contrast agent-enhanced 64-slice cardiac MDCT was a valuable diagnostic tool in the ED triage of patients with chest pain of possible ischemic origin and decreased the need for hospitalization by almost half in this patient cohort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17996512     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.06.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  10 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of coronary heart disease by CT angiography: current and evolving applications.

Authors:  Abhishek Sharma; Armin Arbab-Zadeh
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Cost and resource utilization associated with use of computed tomography to evaluate chest pain in the emergency department: the Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT) study.

Authors:  Edward Hulten; Alexander Goehler; Marcio Sommer Bittencourt; Fabian Bamberg; Christopher L Schlett; Quynh A Truong; John Nichols; Khurram Nasir; Ian S Rogers; Scott G Gazelle; John T Nagurney; Udo Hoffmann; Ron Blankstein
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2013-09-10

3.  64 Slice multi-detector row cardiac CT.

Authors:  Harpreet K Pannu; Pamela T Johnson; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2008-10-22

Review 4.  Cardiac CT in the Emergency Department: Contrasting Evidence from Registries and Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Nam Ju Lee; Harold Litt
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  The diagnostic performance of multi-slice coronary computed tomographic angiography: a systematic review.

Authors:  Daniel A Ollendorf; Michelle Kuba; Steven D Pearson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Diagnostic performance of resting CT myocardial perfusion in patients with possible acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Kelley R Branch; Janet Busey; Lee M Mitsumori; Jared Strote; James H Caldwell; Joshua H Busch; William P Shuman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  Acute chest pain imaging in the emergency department with cardiac computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Ricardo C Cury; Gudrun Feutchner; Constantino S Pena; Warren R Janowitz; Barry T Katzen; Jack A Ziffer
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  Cardiac CT angiography for evaluation of acute chest pain.

Authors:  Nam Ju Lee; Harold Litt
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Reduction in downstream test utilization following introduction of coronary computed tomography in a cardiology practice.

Authors:  Ronald P Karlsberg; Matthew J Budoff; Louise E J Thomson; John D Friedman; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Diagnostic accuracy and clinical outcomes of ECG-gated, whole chest CT in the emergency department.

Authors:  Kelley R Branch; Jared Strote; William P Shuman; Lee M Mitsumori; Janet M Busey; Tessa Rue; James H Caldwell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.