Literature DB >> 17991927

Patient-reported outcomes supporting anticancer product approvals.

Edwin P Rock1, Dianne L Kennedy, Melissa H Furness, William F Pierce, Richard Pazdur, Laurie B Burke.   

Abstract

In 2006, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published draft guidance to provide recommendations for development, validation, implementation, and interpretation of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures that can support treatment benefit claims in product labeling. Here, we summarize and discuss FDA approvals of anticancer products in the context of the draft guidance. We identified anticancer product approvals having efficacy claim(s) based at least in part on a PRO. In addition, we collated limitations of PRO instruments commonly submitted for regulatory review over the period from October 1, 2004 to September 30, 2006. From 1995 onward, nine indications were approved for seven anticancer products based at least in part on a PRO. In eight of nine approvals, PRO data supplemented other evidence of clinical benefit. In seven approvals, the PRO measured a single symptom or functional domain that was directly attributable to the treatment benefit observed in the disease. The FDA's draft PRO guidance describes principles that have been used in anticancer product approvals for more than a decade. PRO end points typically support treatment benefit claims that refer to a patient's symptoms or ability to function. Single-item PROs may be acceptable. PRO data should be both internally consistent and aligned with other evidence of clinical benefit. The FDA encourages sponsors to consult with the FDA early in the process of PRO development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17991927     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.3803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  15 in total

Review 1.  Neoadjuvant paradigm for accelerated drug development: an ideal model in bladder cancer.

Authors:  David D Chism; Michael E Woods; Matthew I Milowsky
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-07-24

2.  Development of the National Cancer Institute's patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE).

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Bryce B Reeve; Sandra A Mitchell; Steven B Clauser; Lori M Minasian; Amylou C Dueck; Tito R Mendoza; Jennifer Hay; Thomas M Atkinson; Amy P Abernethy; Deborah W Bruner; Charles S Cleeland; Jeff A Sloan; Ram Chilukuri; Paul Baumgartner; Andrea Denicoff; Diane St Germain; Ann M O'Mara; Alice Chen; Joseph Kelaghan; Antonia V Bennett; Laura Sit; Lauren Rogak; Allison Barz; Diane B Paul; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Measuring clinical benefit: use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in primary brain tumor clinical trials.

Authors:  Terri S Armstrong
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Patient-Reported Outcomes: Understanding Surgical Efficacy and Quality from the Patient's Perspective.

Authors:  Jessica I Billig; Erika D Sears; Breanna N Travis; Jennifer F Waljee
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  Integration of Patient Reported Outcomes in Drug Development in Genitourinary Cancers.

Authors:  Risa L Wong; Alicia K Morgans
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Patterns of chemotherapy-induced toxicities and outcome in children and adolescents with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Abha A Gupta; Yueh-Yun Chi; James R Anderson; Elizabeth Lyden; Brenda Weigel; Carola Arndt; William H Meyer; Abby Rosenberg; Douglas S Hawkins
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.167

7.  Stakeholder perspectives on implementing the National Cancer Institute's patient-reported outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).

Authors:  Deborah Watkins Bruner; Laura J Hanisch; Bryce B Reeve; Andy M Trotti; Deborah Schrag; Laura Sit; Tito R Mendoza; Lori Minasian; Ann O'Mara; Andrea M Denicoff; Julia H Rowland; Michael Montello; Cindy Geoghegan; Amy P Abernethy; Steven B Clauser; Kathleen Castro; Sandra A Mitchell; Laurie Burke; Ann Marie Trentacosti; Ethan M Basch
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Voices of children and adolescents on phase 1 or phase 2 cancer trials: A new trial endpoint?

Authors:  Pamela S Hinds; Jichuan Wang; Emily Dunn Stern; Catherine Fiona Macpherson; Claire M Wharton; Ruthanna Okorosobo; Yao Iris Cheng; Heather E Gross; Holly J Meany; Shana Jacobs
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Adverse symptom event reporting by patients vs clinicians: relationships with clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Xiaoyu Jia; Glenn Heller; Allison Barz; Laura Sit; Michael Fruscione; Mark Appawu; Alexia Iasonos; Thomas Atkinson; Shari Goldfarb; Ann Culkin; Mark G Kris; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Patient-Reported Outcomes in Oncology Drug Labeling in the United States: A Framework for Navigating Early Challenges.

Authors:  Alan L Shields; Yanni Hao; Meaghan Krohe; Andrew Yaworsky; Iyar Mazar; Catherine Foley; Faisal Mehmed; Denise Globe
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2016-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.