Risa L Wong1,2, Alicia K Morgans3. 1. Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 2. Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA. 3. Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. alicia.morgans@northwestern.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patient reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly utilized in cancer drug development, and are of particular importance in genitourinary cancers due to symptom burden, multiple treatment options with similar efficacy, and often prolonged duration of disease. Here we review current data and perspectives related to use of PROs in drug development for genitourinary cancers, including insights on the regulatory process for drug approval. RECENT FINDINGS: The FDA is committed to incorporating PRO data into the regulatory process for development and approval of new cancer drugs, but challenges exist due to lack of standardization of PRO instrument choice and analytic approach, missing data, and difficulty isolating treatment effect from disease-related effects. We review guidance for standardization of PRO methodology that is nonetheless tailored to disease state and anticipated effects of treatment. PRO and efficacy data should be simultaneously analyzed and reported for best clinical practice. Multiple disease-specific PRO instruments exist for genitourinary cancers. While clinicians, researchers, and regulatory bodies alike recognize the importance of PROs in cancer drug development, challenges remain regarding implementation of best practices.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patient reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly utilized in cancer drug development, and are of particular importance in genitourinary cancers due to symptom burden, multiple treatment options with similar efficacy, and often prolonged duration of disease. Here we review current data and perspectives related to use of PROs in drug development for genitourinary cancers, including insights on the regulatory process for drug approval. RECENT FINDINGS: The FDA is committed to incorporating PRO data into the regulatory process for development and approval of new cancer drugs, but challenges exist due to lack of standardization of PRO instrument choice and analytic approach, missing data, and difficulty isolating treatment effect from disease-related effects. We review guidance for standardization of PRO methodology that is nonetheless tailored to disease state and anticipated effects of treatment. PRO and efficacy data should be simultaneously analyzed and reported for best clinical practice. Multiple disease-specific PRO instruments exist for genitourinary cancers. While clinicians, researchers, and regulatory bodies alike recognize the importance of PROs in cancer drug development, challenges remain regarding implementation of best practices.
Entities:
Keywords:
Drug development; Genitourinary cancer; Patient reported outcomes; Prostate cancer; Quality of life; Regulatory decision making
Authors: Brian D Gonzalez; Heather S L Jim; Kristine A Donovan; Brent J Small; Steve K Sutton; Jong Park; Hui-Yi Lin; Philippe E Spiess; Mayer N Fishman; Paul B Jacobsen Journal: J Urol Date: 2015-03-16 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: David Cella; Susan Yount; Hongyan Du; Rahul Dhanda; Kathleen Gondek; Katie Langefeld; Jacquelyn George; William P Bro; Celeste Kelly; Ronald Bukowski Journal: J Support Oncol Date: 2006-04
Authors: D F Cella; D S Tulsky; G Gray; B Sarafian; E Linn; A Bonomi; M Silberman; S B Yellen; P Winicour; J Brannon Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1993-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Stefanie Schmidt; Olatz Garin; Yolanda Pardo; José M Valderas; Jordi Alonso; Pablo Rebollo; Luis Rajmil; Carlos Garcia-Forero; Montse Ferrer Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2014-04-19 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Maria Manuel Teixeira; Fábio Cardoso Borges; Paula Sousa Ferreira; João Rocha; Bruno Sepodes; Carla Torre Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2022-08-12
Authors: Mona Kamal; Neema Navai; Kelly K Bree; Loretta A Williams; Charles S Cleeland; Shu-En Shen; Xin Shelley Wang Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-08-12 Impact factor: 6.575