Literature DB >> 17991252

A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. I: Clinical and radiographic results.

Rafael Juan Blanes1, Jean Pierre Bernard, Zulema Maria Blanes, Urs Christoph Belser.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term fixture success rate, crestal bone loss and peri-implant soft tissue parameters around ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region of partially edentulous patients.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 192 ITI dental implants were consecutively placed in premolars and molars of 83 partially edentulous patients admitted for treatment at Geneva Dental School. All implants were restored by means of ceramic-to-metal fused fixed partial dentures and single crowns. Patients were followed as part of a prospective longitudinal study focusing on implant success. Surgical, radiographic and clinical variables were collected at the 1-year recall after implant placement and at the most recent clinical evaluation.
RESULTS: The mean observation time was 6 years (range 5-10 years). Four implants failed, yielding a 10-year cumulative survival rate of 97.9%. The mean annual crestal bone loss was -0.04+/-0.2 mm. Hollow-cylinder implants displayed more crestal bone loss (-0.13+/-0.24 mm) than hollow-screw implants (-0.02+/-0.19 mm; P=0.032). Clinical parameters such as age, gender, implant length and bone quality did not affect crestal bone levels. Increase in recession depth (P=0.025) and attachment level (P=0.011) were significantly associated with crestal bone loss.
CONCLUSIONS: ITI dental implants placed in the posterior jaw demonstrate excellent long-term clinical success. Hollow-cylinder implants seem to display a higher risk for crestal bone loss. Recession depth and attachment levels appear to be good clinical indicators of peri-implant bone loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17991252     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01306.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  14 in total

1.  Mastication improvement after partial implant-supported prosthesis use.

Authors:  T M S V Gonçalves; C H Campos; G M Gonçalves; M de Moraes; R C M Rodrigues Garcia
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Randomised study for the 1-year crestal bone maintenance around modified diameter implants with different loading protocols: a radiographic evaluation.

Authors:  Matteo Danza; Pietro Tortora; Alessandro Quaranta; Vittoria Perrotti; Iole Vozza; Adriano Piattelli
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Posterior partially edentulous jaws, planning a rehabilitation with dental implants.

Authors:  Douglas R Monteiro; Emily V F Silva; Eduardo P Pellizzer; Osvaldo Magro Filho; Marcelo C Goiato
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 4.  Advances in surfaces and osseointegration in implantology. Biomimetic surfaces.

Authors:  Matteo Albertini; Marc Fernandez-Yague; Pedro Lázaro; Mariano Herrero-Climent; Jose-Vicente Rios-Santos; Pedro Bullon; Francisco-Javier Gil
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2015-05-01

5.  A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps.

Authors:  Michel Dard; Makoto Shiota; Minoru Sanda; Yasutomo Yajima; Hideshi Sekine; Shohei Kasugai
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2016-04-04

6.  Clinical and radiological evaluation of implants placed with osteotome sinus lift technique: 19-month follow-up.

Authors:  Bijan Movahedian Attar; Samaneh Alaei; Hamid Badrian; Amin Davoudi
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016 Jul-Dec

7.  Knowledge and perception about dental implants among undergraduate dental students.

Authors:  Arati Sharma; Bijay Kumar Chaudhari; Bidhan Shrestha; Pramita Suwal; Prakash Kumar Parajuli; R K Singh; Surya Raj Niraula
Journal:  BDJ Open       Date:  2019-03-14

8.  Bone loss around narrow implants versus standard diameter implants: Retrospective 2-years case-control study.

Authors:  José-Ramón Corcuera-Flores; Manuel Pérez-Fierro; Andrés Blanco-Carrión; Daniel Torres-Lagares; Lizett Castellanos-Cosano; Guillermo Machuca-Portillo
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-01-01

Review 9.  Piezosurgery in implant dentistry.

Authors:  Stefan Stübinger; Andres Stricker; Britt-Isabelle Berg
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2015-11-11

10.  Mechanical and biological complication rates of the modified lateral-screw-retained implant prosthesis in the posterior region: an alternative to the conventional Implant prosthetic system.

Authors:  Jae-Hong Lee; Jong-Bin Lee; Man-Yong Kim; Joon-Ho Yoon; Seong-Ho Choi; Young-Taek Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 1.904

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.