Literature DB >> 17991107

The role of autopsy following pregnancy termination for fetal abnormality.

Jan E Dickinson1, Danielle K Prime, Adrian K Charles.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the frequency of autopsy following pregnancy termination for fetal anomaly and its contribution to subsequent counselling.
METHODS: All medical pregnancy terminations for fetal anomaly performed after 14 weeks gestation from January 1997 to December 2006 were identified and the frequency of autopsy ascertained. The prenatal diagnosis prompting the termination was then compared with the autopsy data, and a diagnostic valuation was determined. The potential autopsy value ranged from no additional information provided, minor added value, significant added value, major added value to non-confirmation of the prenatal findings.
RESULTS: During the ten-year study period, there were 1012 consecutive terminations for fetal abnormality. The principal indications for termination were: karyotypic (38.4%); neural tube defects (16.1%); cardiac (10.3%) and cerebral anomalies (7.5%). Autopsy was performed in 809 cases (79.9%). The autopsy rate progressively declined from 95.1% in 1997 to 67.5% in 2006 (P<0.001). Women declining autopsy were older (31 years (26,35) vs 32 years (27,37), P=0.005) and more likely to have a fetal chromosomal abnormality (30.6% vs 69.9%, P<0.001) (autopsy vs no-autopsy). In euploid cases, autopsy confirmed the prenatal diagnosis with no additional information in 63.5% (357 of 562). In 1.1% (six cases), autopsy added major diagnostic information, and in 15.1% (85 cases), significant information was provided.
CONCLUSIONS: Although contemporary prenatal testing has improved the recognition of fetal abnormalities, autopsy remains a valued tool by providing diagnosis or clarification of some prenatal findings in 16% of cases. Fetal autopsy rates are declining and this trend may lead to a loss of diagnostic and recurrence risk-counselling information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17991107     DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2007.00777.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  7 in total

1.  Trends in fetal indications for termination of pregnancy between 2002 and 2010 at a tertiary referral centre.

Authors:  Aytül Corbacıoğlu; Halil Aslan; Serdar Aydın; Ozgür Akbayır; Fırat Ersan; Verda Alpay; Hediye Dağdeviren; Songül Kısacık
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2012-06-01

Review 2.  Postmortem cardiac imaging in fetuses and children.

Authors:  Andrew M Taylor; Owen J Arthurs; Neil J Sebire
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-04-01

3.  Diagnostic assessment of foetal brain malformations with intra-uterine MRI versus perinatal post-mortem MRI.

Authors:  Stacy K Goergen; Ekaterina Alibrahim; Nishentha Govender; Alexandra Stanislavsky; Christian Abel; Stacey Prystupa; Jacquelene Collett; Susan C Shelmerdine; Owen J Arthurs
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Postmortem magnetic resonance imaging vs autopsy of second trimester fetuses terminated due to anomalies.

Authors:  Anna Hellkvist; Johan Wikström; Ajlana Mulic-Lutvica; Katharina Ericson; Christopher Eriksson-Falkerby; Peter Lindgren; Eva Penno; Ove Axelsson
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2019-03-03       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  Three-Dimensional Printing of Fetal Models of Congenital Heart Disease Derived From Microfocus Computed Tomography: A Case Series.

Authors:  Camilla Sandrini; Claudio Lombardi; Andrew I U Shearn; Maria Victoria Ordonez; Massimo Caputo; Francesca Presti; Giovanni Battista Luciani; Lucia Rossetti; Giovanni Biglino
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 3.418

6.  Prenatal and Obstetric Parameters of Late Terminations: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Anne Dathan-Stumpf; Julia Kern; Renaldo Faber; Holger Stepan
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 7.  Postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging: where do we stand?

Authors:  Aurélie D'Hondt; Marie Cassart; Raymond De Maubeuge; Gustavo Soto Ares; Jacques Rommens; E Fred Avni
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2018-06-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.