Literature DB >> 17988870

Subtalar neutral position as an offset for a kinematic model of the foot during walking.

Jeff R Houck1, Josh M Tome, Deborah A Nawoczenski.   

Abstract

The lack of a common reference position when defining foot postures may underestimate the ability to differentiate foot function in subjects with pathology. The effect of using the subtalar neutral (STN) position as an offset for both rearfoot and forefoot through comparison of the kinematic walking patterns of subjects classified as normal (n=7) and abnormally pronated (n=14) foot postures was completed. An Optotrak Motion Analysis System (Northern Digital, Inc.) integrated with Motion Monitor Software (Innovative Sports, Inc.) was used to track three-dimensional movement of the leg, rearfoot and first metatarsal segments. Intrarater reliability of positioning the foot into STN using clinical guidelines was determined for a single rater for 21 subjects. Walking data were subsequently compared before and after an offset was applied to the rearfoot and first metatarsal segments. Repeated measures of foot positioning found the STN position to be highly repeatable (intraclass correlation coefficients>0.9), with peak errors ranging from 1.9 degrees to 4.3 degrees . Utilizing STN as the offset resulted in a significant increase in rearfoot eversion (p=0.019) during early stance, and greater first metatarsal dorsiflexion (p<0.007) across stance in the pronated foot groups that was not observed prior to applying the offset. When applied to subjects with differing foot postures, the selection of a common reference position that is both clinically appropriate and reliable may distinguish kinematic patterns during walking that are consistent with theories of abnormal pronation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17988870     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  11 in total

1.  Custom-molded foot-orthosis intervention and multisegment medial foot kinematics during walking.

Authors:  Stephen C Cobb; Laurie L Tis; Jeffrey T Johnson; Yong Tai Wang; Mark D Geil
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Arch height and maximum rearfoot eversion during jogging in 2 static neutral positions.

Authors:  Sae Yong Lee; Jay Hertel
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Foot kinematics during a bilateral heel rise test in participants with stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction.

Authors:  Jeff R Houck; Christopher Neville; Josh Tome; A Samuel Flemister
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.751

4.  Ankle and foot kinematics associated with stage II PTTD during stance.

Authors:  Jeff R Houck; Christopher G Neville; Josh Tome; Adolph S Flemister
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 5.  Musculoskeletal conditions of the foot and ankle: assessments and treatment options.

Authors:  Smita Rao; Jody L Riskowski; Marian T Hannan
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.098

6.  A Three-dimensional Gait Analysis of People with Flat Arched Feet on an Ascending Slope.

Authors:  Myoung-Kwon Kim; Yun-Seop Lee
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-09-17

7.  The feasibility of a modified shoe for multi-segment foot motion analysis: a preliminary study.

Authors:  J Halstead; A M Keenan; G J Chapman; A C Redmond
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  The Influence of Plantar Short Foot Muscle Exercises on the Lower Extremity Muscle Strength and Power in Proximal Segments of the Kinematic Chain in Long-Distance Runners.

Authors:  Iwona Sulowska; Anna Mika; Łukasz Oleksy; Artur Stolarczyk
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Are clinical measures of foot posture and mobility associated with foot kinematics when walking?

Authors:  Andrew K Buldt; George S Murley; Pazit Levinger; Hylton B Menz; Christopher J Nester; Karl B Landorf
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 2.303

10.  A comparison of the free moment pattern between normal and hyper-pronated aligned feet in female subjects during the stance phase of gait.

Authors:  Yazdani F; Razeghi M; Ebrahimi S
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2020-02-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.