Literature DB >> 1798764

Impact of sex and age on sensory evaluation of sugar and fat in dairy products.

M O Monneuse1, F Bellisle, J Louis-Sylvestre.   

Abstract

Ratings of sugar/fat mixtures were examined in eight groups (2 sexes x 4 age categories) of healthy, normal-weight subjects (N = 226). The subjects were tested immediately before and after a standard lunch. Stimuli were 20 semisolid mixtures of soft white cheese or heavy cream containing between 0 and 30 grams of fat per 100 g, and sweetened with 1, 5, 10, 20 or 40% sucrose (wt./wt.). The subjects briefly tasted the samples; they rated stimulus sweetness, fat content and pleasantness, using 9-point scales. Sweetness ratings were a direct function of sucrose concentration. Rating of fat content was more accurate in older subjects. While palatability was nearly synonymous with sugar content in young boys, most groups showed inverted U-shaped preference functions, with optimal sucrose level at 10% in females and 20% in males. Stimuli were rated very slightly but significantly fatter and sweeter after than before lunch; taste preference ratings in the fed condition were sometimes reduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1798764     DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(91)90569-a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  9 in total

Review 1.  Flavour preferences in youth versus adults: a review.

Authors:  Allison C Hoffman; Raydel Valdes Salgado; Carolyn Dresler; Rachel Williams Faller; Christopher Bartlett
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 2.  History repeats itself: Role of characterizing flavors on nicotine use and abuse.

Authors:  Theresa Patten; Mariella De Biasi
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 5.250

3.  The proof is in the pudding: children prefer lower fat but higher sugar than do mothers.

Authors:  J A Mennella; S Finkbeiner; D R Reed
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 5.095

4.  Oral sensory phenotype identifies level of sugar and fat required for maximal liking.

Authors:  John E Hayes; Valerie B Duffy
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-05-02

5.  Motives for eating tasty foods associated with binge-eating. Results from a student and a weight-loss seeking population.

Authors:  M M Boggiano; E E Burgess; B Turan; T Soleymani; S Daniel; L D Vinson; K L Lokken; B C Wingo; A Morse
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.868

6.  A marker of growth differs between adolescents with high vs. low sugar preference.

Authors:  Susan E Coldwell; Teresa K Oswald; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-12-31

7.  Caries risk in children of Udaipur City, India using genetic taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil.

Authors:  Payel Karmakar; Ruchi Arora; Chhaya Patel; Bhumi Sarvaiya; Aditi Singh; Mittal Patel
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec

8.  Sweetness and food preference.

Authors:  Adam Drewnowski; Julie A Mennella; Susan L Johnson; France Bellisle
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 4.798

9.  Consuming Gymnema sylvestre Reduces the Desire for High-Sugar Sweet Foods.

Authors:  Sophie Turner; Charles Diako; Rozanne Kruger; Marie Wong; Warrick Wood; Kay Rutherfurd-Markwick; Ajmol Ali
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 5.717

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.