Literature DB >> 17986427

Cross-generational fitness benefits of mating and male seminal fluid.

Nicholas K Priest1, Deborah A Roach, Laura F Galloway.   

Abstract

In many species, the physical act of mating and exposure to accessory gland proteins (Acps) in male seminal fluid reduces female survival and offspring production. It is not clear what males gain from harming their sexual partners or why females mate frequently despite being harmed. Using sterile strains of Drosophila melanogaster that differ in their production of Acps, we found that both the physical act of mating and exposure to male seminal fluid in mothers increase the fitness of daughters. We show that the changes in daughter fitness are mediated by parental effects, not by sexual selection involving good genes or owing to variation in maternal egg production. These results support the idea that male harm of females might partly evolve through cross-generational fitness benefits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17986427      PMCID: PMC2412926          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  20 in total

1.  Male attractiveness and differential testosterone investment in zebra finch eggs.

Authors:  D Gil; J Graves; N Hazon; A Wells
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits.

Authors:  M D Jennions; M Petrie
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2000-02

3.  The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  Males influence maternal effects that promote sexual selection: a quantitative genetic experiment with dung beetles Onthophagus taurus.

Authors:  Janne S Kotiaho; Leigh W Simmons; John Hunt; Joseph L Tomkins
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Maternal effects, paternal effects and sexual selection.

Authors:  A Qvarnström; T D. Price
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Sexy sons from re-mating do not recoup the direct costs of harmful male interactions in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system.

Authors:  N Orteiza; J E Linder; W R Rice
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 7.  Assessing sexual conflict in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system.

Authors:  William R Rice; Andrew D Stewart; Edward H Morrow; Jodell E Linder; Nicole Orteiza; Phillip G Byrne
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Why are males bad for females? Models for the evolution of damaging male mating behavior.

Authors:  C M Lessells
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 9.  The gifts that keep on giving: physiological functions and evolutionary dynamics of male seminal proteins in Drosophila.

Authors:  M F Wolfner
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Genes regulated by mating, sperm, or seminal proteins in mated female Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Lisa A McGraw; Greg Gibson; Andrew G Clark; Mariana F Wolfner
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-08-24       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  14 in total

1.  Potential confounds to an assay of cross-generational fitness benefits of mating and male seminal fluid.

Authors:  Tristan A F Long; Andrew D Stewart; Paige M Miller
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Effects of paternal phenotype and environmental variability on age and size at maturity in a male dimorphic mite.

Authors:  Isabel M Smallegange
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2011-03-09

3.  Transgenerational effects of sexual interactions and sexual conflict: non-sires boost the fecundity of females in the following generation.

Authors:  Francisco Garcia-Gonzalez; Damian K Dowling
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Transgenerational effects of maternal sexual interactions in seed beetles.

Authors:  Susanne R K Zajitschek; Damian K Dowling; Megan L Head; Eduardo Rodriguez-Exposito; Francisco Garcia-Gonzalez
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Molecular social interactions: Drosophila melanogaster seminal fluid proteins as a case study.

Authors:  Laura K Sirot; Brooke A LaFlamme; Jessica L Sitnik; C Dustin Rubinstein; Frank W Avila; Clement Y Chow; Mariana F Wolfner
Journal:  Adv Genet       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 1.944

6.  The evolution of sex peptide: sexual conflict, cooperation, and coevolution.

Authors:  Ben R Hopkins; Jennifer C Perry
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2022-03-06

7.  Positional RNA-Seq identifies candidate genes for phenotypic engineering of sexual traits.

Authors:  Roberto Arbore; Kiyono Sekii; Christian Beisel; Peter Ladurner; Eugene Berezikov; Lukas Schärer
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 3.172

8.  Immune anticipation of mating in Drosophila: Turandot M promotes immunity against sexually transmitted fungal infections.

Authors:  Weihao Zhong; Colin D McClure; Cara R Evans; David T Mlynski; Elina Immonen; Michael G Ritchie; Nicholas K Priest
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Related male Drosophila melanogaster reared together as larvae fight less and sire longer lived daughters.

Authors:  Pau Carazo; Jennifer C Perry; Fern Johnson; Tommaso Pizzari; Stuart Wigby
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Maternal caloric restriction partially rescues the deleterious effects of advanced maternal age on offspring.

Authors:  Kristin E Gribble; George Jarvis; Martha Bock; David B Mark Welch
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 9.304

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.