OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether transmural care for people with spinal cord injury living in the community has more impact on health outcomes than traditional follow-up care within the Netherlands. DESIGN: Quasi-experiment with 12 months of follow-up. SETTING: Eight Dutch rehabilitation centres. SUBJECTS: Thirty-one patients who received transmural care in two ;experimental' rehabilitation centres were compared with a matched sample of 31 patients having received ;usual follow-up care' in six other rehabilitation centres. INTERVENTION: The core component of the transmural care consists of a transmural nurse, who 'liaises' between former patients living in the community, primary care professionals and the rehabilitation team. The transmural care model provides activities to support patients and their family/partners and activities to promote continuity of care. MAIN MEASURES: The prevalence of pressure sores and urinary tract infections; the number and duration of re-admissions to hospital and rehabilitation centre due to pressure sores, bladder and bowel problems; and the experienced quality of follow-up care. RESULTS: The transmural care, as implemented, did not influence the health outcomes. The prevalence of pressure sores, urinary tract infections and the number of re-admissions (due to pressure sores, bladder and bowel problems) was respectively 13, 13 and 4 in the intervention group versus 14, 15 and 6 in the usual follow-up care group. Since the transmural care had been incompletely implemented and there were methodological and practical limitations, we formulated no final conclusions regarding its effectiveness. CONCLUSION: Implementing the transmural care model strictly according to protocol may improve its effectiveness.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether transmural care for people with spinal cord injury living in the community has more impact on health outcomes than traditional follow-up care within the Netherlands. DESIGN: Quasi-experiment with 12 months of follow-up. SETTING: Eight Dutch rehabilitation centres. SUBJECTS: Thirty-one patients who received transmural care in two ;experimental' rehabilitation centres were compared with a matched sample of 31 patients having received ;usual follow-up care' in six other rehabilitation centres. INTERVENTION: The core component of the transmural care consists of a transmural nurse, who 'liaises' between former patients living in the community, primary care professionals and the rehabilitation team. The transmural care model provides activities to support patients and their family/partners and activities to promote continuity of care. MAIN MEASURES: The prevalence of pressure sores and urinary tract infections; the number and duration of re-admissions to hospital and rehabilitation centre due to pressure sores, bladder and bowel problems; and the experienced quality of follow-up care. RESULTS: The transmural care, as implemented, did not influence the health outcomes. The prevalence of pressure sores, urinary tract infections and the number of re-admissions (due to pressure sores, bladder and bowel problems) was respectively 13, 13 and 4 in the intervention group versus 14, 15 and 6 in the usual follow-up care group. Since the transmural care had been incompletely implemented and there were methodological and practical limitations, we formulated no final conclusions regarding its effectiveness. CONCLUSION: Implementing the transmural care model strictly according to protocol may improve its effectiveness.
Authors: Mike Carlson; Cheryl L P Vigen; Salah Rubayi; Erna Imperatore Blanche; Jeanine Blanchard; Michal Atkins; Barbara Bates-Jensen; Susan L Garber; Elizabeth A Pyatak; Jesus Diaz; Lucia I Florindez; Joel W Hay; Trudy Mallinson; Jennifer B Unger; Stanley Paul Azen; Michael Scott; Alison Cogan; Florence Clark Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2017-04-17 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Sarah E P Munce; Laure Perrier; Andrea C Tricco; Sharon E Straus; Michael G Fehlings; Monika Kastner; Eunice Jang; Fiona Webster; Susan B Jaglal Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2013-02-22
Authors: Chantal F Hillebregt; Eline W M Scholten; Marjolijn Ketelaar; Marcel W M Post; Johanna M A Visser-Meily Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-03-08 Impact factor: 2.692