Literature DB >> 17982721

Comparison of 1-day, 2-day, and 3-day administration of antimicrobial prophylaxis in radical prostatectomy.

Koh Takeyama1, Satoshi Takahashi, Toshihiro Maeda, Masatoshi Mutoh, Yasuharu Kunishima, Masanori Matsukawa, Yoshio Takagi.   

Abstract

An adequate protocol for antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) in radical prostatectomy has not been established. We retrospectively compared the incidence and severity of infectious complications after radical prostatectomy with three different protocols for AMP. The study cohort consisted of 67 patients with prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy at Hakodate Goryoukaku Hospital between January 2003 and December 2005. As a prophylactic antimicrobial agent, one of the cephalosporins or penicillins was administered intravenously to all patients. The analyzed protocols were for: (1) a 3-day group: administration of AMP until the second postoperative day (POD 2), (2) a 2-day group: administration of AMP until POD 1, and (3) a 1-day group: administration of AMP only on the operative day. The incidence and severity of infectious complications were retrospectively investigated. Three patients in the 3-day group (9.4%), 2 patients in the 2-day group (12.5%), and 2 patients in the 1-day group (10.5%) developed some infectious complications. The incidence of infectious complications was not significantly different among the three groups. No patients developed severe infectious complications such as sepsis. We conclude that single-day AMP is sufficient in patients with radical prostatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17982721     DOI: 10.1007/s10156-007-0540-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Chemother        ISSN: 1341-321X            Impact factor:   2.211


  5 in total

1.  Prophylactic antibiotic treatment following laparoscopic robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for the prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections: did the AUA guidelines make a difference?

Authors:  Miki Haifler; Yoram Mor; Zohar Dotan; Jacob Ramon; Dorit E Zilberman
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-12-16

2.  Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Radical Prostatectomy: Comparison of 2-Day and More than 2-Day Prophylaxis.

Authors:  Bosung Shin; Ho Seok Chung; Eu Chang Hwang; Seung Il Jung; Dong Deuk Kwon
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  Evaluation of Surgical Site Infection in Mini-invasive Urological Surgery.

Authors:  Jacopo Adolfo Rossi de Vermandois; Giovanni Cochetti; Michele Del Zingaro; Alberto Santoro; Mattia Panciarola; Andrea Boni; Matteo Marsico; Gianluca Gaudio; Alessio Paladini; Paolo Guiggi; Roberto Cirocchi; Ettore Mearini
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2019-09-15

4.  A prospective Korean multicenter study for infectious complications in patients undergoing prostate surgery: risk factors and efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis.

Authors:  Eu Chang Hwang; Seung Il Jung; Dong Deuk Kwon; Gilho Lee; Jae Hyun Bae; Yong Gil Na; Seung Ki Min; Hwancheol Son; Sun Ju Lee; Jae Min Chung; Hong Chung; In Rae Cho; Young Ho Kim; Tae-Hyoung Kim; In Ho Chang
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Assessment of Guideline Discordance With Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Best Practices for Common Urologic Procedures.

Authors:  Chelsea Khaw; Anthony D Oberle; Brian C Lund; Jason Egge; Brett H Heintz; Bradley A Erickson; Daniel J Livorsi
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-12-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.