Literature DB >> 17981248

Pancreatic stents for prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.

Martin L Freeman1.   

Abstract

Placement of pancreatic stents is a relatively new and increasingly adopted approach to reduce the risk of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis. Evidence for the efficacy of pancreatic stents in reducing post-ERCP pancreatitis continues to accumulate. Routine use of pancreatic stents in high-risk cases at advanced centers has changed the complexion of ERCP, reducing the incidence and severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis to a more acceptable level, and eliminating some of the fear factor surrounding previously prohibitively risky settings, such as treatment of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD). On the other hand, the adoption of prophylactic pancreatic stenting into some practices has been sporadic. Problems with pancreatic stent placement include technical difficulty with placement, need for follow-up evaluation to ensure passage or removal, and potential for inducing pancreatic ductal injury. There remain many challenges and unanswered questions which will be addressed in this review, including which patients are at risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis, how might pancreatic stents reduce risk, what is the evidence supporting efficacy of pancreatic stenting in reducing risk; and based on those data, which ERCPs are at sufficiently high risk to warrant a stent; at what point in an ERCP should a pancreatic stent be placed; how long pancreatic stents need to remain in place to be effective, the risk of inducing pancreatic duct injury by placement of a stent; the frequency and consequences of failure at attempted stent placement, and effectiveness of pancreatic stent placement in the hands of those with limited experience. Current recommendations for use of pancreatic stents and areas requiring further investigation are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17981248     DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  55 in total

1.  Low yield of significant findings on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with pancreatobiliary pain and no objective findings.

Authors:  Timothy D Imler; Stuart Sherman; Lee McHenry; Evan L Fogel; James L Watkins; Glen A Lehman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Effectiveness and tolerability of NSAIDs in the prophylaxis of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ming-Hua Zheng; Mao-Bin Meng; Dian-Na Gu; Lei Zhang; Ai-Min Wu; Qian Jiang; Yong-Ping Chen
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2009-08

Review 3.  Minimizing complications in pancreaticobiliary endoscopy.

Authors:  Olga Barkay; Mouen Khashab; Mohammad Al-Haddad; Evan L Fogel
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2009-04

4.  Current Status of Endoscopic Stenting of the Pancreatic Duct as Prophylaxis Against Post-ERCP Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Martin L Freeman
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2012-09

5.  Can endoscopic palliation of large neoplasm increase the risk of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography?

Authors:  Gianfranco Fanello; Fausto Fiocca; Michele Benedetti; Gabriele Martino; Michele Marengo; Roberto Luca Meniconi; Federica Papini; Piero Chirletti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Endoscopic management of post-liver transplant biliary complications.

Authors:  Mohit Girotra; Kaartik Soota; Jagpal S Klair; Shyam M Dang; Farshad Aduli
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-05-16

Review 7.  Effectiveness of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao Li; Li-Ping Tao; Chun-Hui Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Prophecy about post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: from divination to science.

Authors:  Sung-Hoon Moon; Myung-Hwan Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Risk models for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP): smoking and chronic liver disease are predictors of protection against PEP.

Authors:  Matthew J DiMagno; Joshua P Spaete; Darren D Ballard; Erik-Jan Wamsteker; Sameer D Saini
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 10.  Prophylactic pancreatic stent placement and post-ERCP pancreatitis: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Takero Mazaki; Kazunari Mado; Hideki Masuda; Motomi Shiono
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 7.527

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.