Literature DB >> 17980790

Intermediate follow-up after endovascular aneurysm repair: can we forgo CT scanning in certain patients?

Jared Tomlinson1, Joanne McNamara, Jubin Matloubieh, Joseph Hart, Michael J Singh, Mark G Davies, Jeffrey M Rhodes, Karl A Illig.   

Abstract

Current recommendations for follow-up after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR) include yearly computed tomographic (CT) scans after the first year. We hypothesize that this is unnecessary for patients who have aneurysm sacs that are stable or shrinking at 1 year and no evidence of endoleak. To explore this hypothesis, we reviewed the records of all patients undergoing EVAR at our institution who were implanted with grafts that are currently commercially available and had a minimum of 18 months' follow-up. Of 415 patients who underwent EVAR over an 8-year period, 93 met the entry criteria. At a mean follow-up of approximately 3 years, secondary interventions were required in 13%, 39%, and 25% of patients undergoing EVAR with Zenith, AneuRx, and Excluder devices, respectively, and secondary interventions after the first year were required in 3%, 22%, and 8% of such grafts, respectively. Seventy-one patients (76%) had aneurysm sacs that were stable or shrinking at 1 year and no endoleak. Only two of these patients subsequently required reintervention. Both patients had AneuRx grafts, and both problems could have easily been identified without CT scanning. Our data support the hypothesis that patients who meet these criteria at 1 year are unlikely to have problems that cannot be identified by ultrasound and/or clinical evaluation alone and, thus, that CT scans are not necessary after this point, especially in patients with Zenith or reengineered Excluder devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17980790     DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2007.07.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0890-5096            Impact factor:   1.466


  3 in total

Review 1.  Duplex Ultrasound versus Computed Tomography for the Postoperative Follow-Up of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Where Do We Stand Now?

Authors:  Evridiki Karanikola; Ilias Dalainas; Georgios Karaolanis; Georgios Zografos; Konstantinos Filis
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2014-09

2.  Volumetric analysis of the aneurysmal sac with computed tomography in the follow-up of abdominal aortic aneurysms after endovascular treatment.

Authors:  A Canì; E Cotta; C Recaldini; D Lumia; F Fontana; G Carrafiello; V Colli; C Fugazzola
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 3.  Surgical Versus Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Evidence to Guide the Optimal Approach for the Individual Patient.

Authors:  Theodore Hart; Ross Milner
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.113

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.