Literature DB >> 17980267

Increased aortic arch calcification in patients older than 75 years: implications for carotid artery stenting in elderly patients.

Hernan A Bazan1, Sanjeev Pradhan, Hamid Mojibian, Tassos Kyriakides, Alan Dardik.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies reveal a consistently higher periprocedural risk of stroke during carotid artery stenting in octogenarians compared with younger patients. The mechanisms accounting for this increased risk of embolization and stroke in elderly patients are poorly understood. We analyzed the calcium content and aortic arch type in a consecutive series of patients to determine whether aortic arch calcium content is related to either age or arch type classification.
METHODS: Aortic arch calcium content and arch classification were examined in consecutive patients undergoing thoracic computed tomography scans. The calcium content of the aortic arch, measured from the aortic root to the descending thoracic aorta at the level of the carina, was determined by using a coronary calcium score grade. The aortic arch classification was determined by using two-dimensional and multiplanar image reconstructions. Linear regression and analysis of variance were used to determine the effect of age, arch classification, and patient comorbidity on aortic arch calcium content.
RESULTS: The computed tomography scans of 94 patients were analyzed. There was a positive correlation between age and aortic arch calcium content; the mean calcium score (Agatston units) for patients increased by decade (age <50 years, 12.6 +/- 12.3, n = 18; age 50-59 years, 14.6 +/- 8.2, n = 21; age 60-69 years, 276 +/- 120, n = 17; age 70-79 years, 1382 +/- 366, n = 27; age > or =80 years, 3889 +/- 778, n = 11; P < .001). There was significantly more arch calcium in patients 75 years or older compared with patients younger than 75 years (2458 +/- 447 vs 145 +/- 49; P < .001). There was no effect of patient comorbidity on aortic arch calcium content. Patients with type II aortic arches were older and had a higher calcium content compared with patients with type I aortic arches (2028 +/- 546 vs 712 +/- 191; P = .01). Power analysis showed more than 99% power to detect differences between patients younger than 75 years and 75 years or older.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients 75 years of age or older have significantly more aortic arch calcification compared with younger patients. Increased arch calcium content and type II aortic arches may be markers of increased potential for embolization during endovascular manipulation that transverses the aortic arch. Preprocedural determination of aortic arch calcification and morphology may help to further stratify periprocedural carotid artery stenting risk in elderly patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17980267     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.06.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  17 in total

1.  Risk factors predictive of carotid artery stenting-associated subclinical microemboli.

Authors:  Wei Zhou; Rosa Zareie; Maureen Tedesco; Simin Gholibeikian; Barton Lane; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Allyson Rosen
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2011-03

2.  A rat model of diabetic artery calcification.

Authors:  X Ren; Qin Wei; H Shao; Z Sun; N Liu
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Age-related neointimal hyperplasia is associated with monocyte infiltration after balloon angioplasty.

Authors:  Sammy D D Eghbalieh; Paraag Chowdhary; Akihito Muto; Kenneth R Ziegler; Fabio A Kudo; Jose M Pimiento; Issa Mirmehdi; Lynn S Model; Yuka Kondo; Toshiya Nishibe; Alan Dardik
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 6.053

4.  Age and outcomes after carotid stenting and endarterectomy: the carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial.

Authors:  Jenifer H Voeks; George Howard; Gary S Roubin; Mahmoud B Malas; David J Cohen; W Charles Sternbergh; Herbert D Aronow; Mark K Eskandari; Alice J Sheffet; Brajesh K Lal; James F Meschia; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) Vascular Registry evaluation of comparative effectiveness of carotid revascularization procedures stratified by Medicare age.

Authors:  Jeffrey Jim; Brian G Rubin; Joseph J Ricotta; Christopher T Kenwood; Flora S Siami; Gregorio A Sicard
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Long-term mortality and follow-up after carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  S Arif; J Wojtasik; A Dziewierz; K Bartuś; D Dudek; S Bartuś
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 0.471

7.  The association of clinical variables and filter design with carotid artery stenting thirty-day outcome.

Authors:  G M Siewiorek; R T Krafty; M H Wholey; E A Finol
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 7.069

Review 8.  Future management of carotid stenosis: role of urgent carotid interventions in the acutely symptomatic carotid patient and best medical therapy for asymptomatic carotid disease.

Authors:  Hernan A Bazan; Taylor A Smith; Melissa J Donovan; W Charles Sternbergh
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

9.  Intravascular ultrasound as a clinical adjunct for carotid plaque characterization.

Authors:  Elizabeth Hitchner; Mohamed A Zayed; George Lee; Doug Morrison; Barton Lane; Wei Zhou
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  Characteristics that define high risk in carotid endarterectomy from the Vascular Study Group of New England.

Authors:  Lindsay Gates; Robert Botta; Felix Schlosser; Philip Goodney; Margriet Fokkema; Marc Schermerhorn; Timur Sarac; Jeffrey Indes
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.268

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.