OBJECTIVE: To identify whether the order of performing transplant and bladder reconstruction operations in children who need both operations affects outcome of either operation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective case note review was performed of children identified from our database, who had undergone both renal transplantation and bladder augmentation between 1990 and 2005. RESULTS: In all, 18 renal transplants (eight live-related) were performed in 16 children with 10 transplants done after bladder augmentation and eight transplants done before augmentation. The median age at transplantation was 7.5 years and at augmentation was 7.0 years. The median interval between the operations was 33.5 months and the median follow-up was 58.4 months after transplantation. Outcomes were compared between the two groups of patients: those who received their transplantation before bladder augmentation, and those who were transplanted after bladder augmentation. There was no difference between these groups in: the pre- transplant estimated glomerular filtration rate, inpatient stay after transplantation or after augmentation, and incidence of urinary tract infection in the 3 months after renal transplantation or after bladder augmentation. There was no statistical difference in renal allograft loss with one graft failure in the group who were augmented first, and four graft failures in the group who were transplanted first. However, it is of note that the single graft failure in the patient augmented first was due to renal artery thrombosis on the first day related to a double arterial anastomosis, whilst in the other group, three of the graft failures were in transplants that had initially been drained by ureterostomy. Three patients in the group transplanted first developed significant ureteric pathology, of which one developed graft failure. CONCLUSION: Bladder reconstruction can be performed safely before transplantation; it does not increase complications and might better protect the renal graft and specifically the transplant ureter.
OBJECTIVE: To identify whether the order of performing transplant and bladder reconstruction operations in children who need both operations affects outcome of either operation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective case note review was performed of children identified from our database, who had undergone both renal transplantation and bladder augmentation between 1990 and 2005. RESULTS: In all, 18 renal transplants (eight live-related) were performed in 16 children with 10 transplants done after bladder augmentation and eight transplants done before augmentation. The median age at transplantation was 7.5 years and at augmentation was 7.0 years. The median interval between the operations was 33.5 months and the median follow-up was 58.4 months after transplantation. Outcomes were compared between the two groups of patients: those who received their transplantation before bladder augmentation, and those who were transplanted after bladder augmentation. There was no difference between these groups in: the pre- transplant estimated glomerular filtration rate, inpatient stay after transplantation or after augmentation, and incidence of urinary tract infection in the 3 months after renal transplantation or after bladder augmentation. There was no statistical difference in renal allograft loss with one graft failure in the group who were augmented first, and four graft failures in the group who were transplanted first. However, it is of note that the single graft failure in the patient augmented first was due to renal artery thrombosis on the first day related to a double arterial anastomosis, whilst in the other group, three of the graft failures were in transplants that had initially been drained by ureterostomy. Three patients in the group transplanted first developed significant ureteric pathology, of which one developed graft failure. CONCLUSION: Bladder reconstruction can be performed safely before transplantation; it does not increase complications and might better protect the renal graft and specifically the transplant ureter.
Authors: Cristian Sager; Carol Burek; Víctor Durán; Juan Pablo Corbetta; Santiago Weller; Enrique Paz; Juan Carlos López Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2010-08-31 Impact factor: 1.827
Authors: Jin Sun Choi; Hyunmin Ko; Hyo Kee Kim; Chris Chung; Ahram Han; Seung-Kee Min; Jongwon Ha; Sangil Min Journal: Korean J Transplant Date: 2020-10-30
Authors: Loes Oomen; Charlotte Bootsma-Robroeks; Elisabeth Cornelissen; Liesbeth de Wall; Wout Feitz Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2022-04-08 Impact factor: 3.569