Literature DB >> 17979771

An integrated approach to fragment-based lead generation: philosophy, strategy and case studies from AstraZeneca's drug discovery programmes.

Jeffrey S Albert1, Niklas Blomberg, Alexander L Breeze, Alastair J H Brown, Jeremy N Burrows, Philip D Edwards, Rutger H A Folmer, Stefan Geschwindner, Ed J Griffen, Peter W Kenny, Thorsten Nowak, Lise-Lotte Olsson, Hitesh Sanganee, Adam B Shapiro.   

Abstract

Fragment-based lead generation (FBLG) has recently emerged as an alternative to traditional high throughput screening (HTS) to identify initial chemistry starting points for drug discovery programs. In comparison to HTS screening libraries, the screening sets for FBLG tend to contain orders of magnitude fewer compounds, and the compounds themselves are less structurally complex and have lower molecular weight. This report summarises the advent of FBLG within the industry and then describes the FBLG experience at AstraZeneca. We discuss (1) optimising the design of screening libraries, (2) hit detection methodologies, (3) evaluation of hit quality and use of ligand efficiency calculations, and (4) approaches to evolve fragment-based, low complexity hits towards drug-like leads. Furthermore, we exemplify our use of FBLG with case studies in the following drug discovery areas: antibacterial enzyme targets, GPCRs (melanocortin 4 receptor modulators), prostaglandin D2 synthase inhibitors, phosphatase inhibitors (protein tyrosine phosphotase 1B), and protease inhibitors (b-secretase).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17979771     DOI: 10.2174/156802607782341091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem        ISSN: 1568-0266            Impact factor:   3.295


  29 in total

Review 1.  The influence of the 'organizational factor' on compound quality in drug discovery.

Authors:  Paul D Leeson; Stephen A St-Gallay
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Lessons for fragment library design: analysis of output from multiple screening campaigns.

Authors:  I-Jen Chen; Roderick E Hubbard
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Virtual fragment screening: an exploration of various docking and scoring protocols for fragments using Glide.

Authors:  Sameer Kawatkar; Hongming Wang; Ryszard Czerminski; Diane Joseph-McCarthy
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Design of compound libraries for fragment screening.

Authors:  Niklas Blomberg; David A Cosgrove; Peter W Kenny; Karin Kolmodin
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  The importance of molecular complexity in the design of screening libraries.

Authors:  Shahul H Nilar; Ngai Ling Ma; Thomas H Keller
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Challenges of fragment screening.

Authors:  Diane Joseph-McCarthy
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  The multiple roles of computational chemistry in fragment-based drug design.

Authors:  Richard Law; Oliver Barker; John J Barker; Thomas Hesterkamp; Robert Godemann; Ole Andersen; Tara Fryatt; Steve Courtney; Dave Hallett; Mark Whittaker
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 8.  The impact of GPCR structures on pharmacology and structure-based drug design.

Authors:  Miles Congreve; Fiona Marshall
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 8.739

9.  Using protein-ligand docking to assess the chemical tractability of inhibiting a protein target.

Authors:  Richard A Ward
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 1.810

10.  Fragment-based lead discovery: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Chaohong Sun; Andrew M Petros; Philip J Hajduk
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.