Literature DB >> 17979135

Social disparities in the burden of occupational exposures: results of a cross-sectional study.

Margaret M Quinn1, Grace Sembajwe, Anne M Stoddard, David Kriebel, Nancy Krieger, Glorian Sorensen, Cathy Hartman, Deepa Naishadham, Elizabeth M Barbeau.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most occupational studies evaluate a single exposure in relation to a particular disease. However, workers typically experience multiple exposures simultaneously. There is also increasing evidence of disparities in health by sociodemographic characteristics, mostly related to social position such as gender, race/ethnicity, immigration status, income, and education. Little information exists on the worker experience of multiple occupational exposures as they vary among social groups. The objectives of this article were to: assess the burden of exposures reported within 1 year by a socially diverse population working in a range of industries; and evaluate whether sociodemographic characteristics affected the patterns of these exposures.
METHODS: Study participants were from 14 unionized worksites in meat processing, electrical lighting manufacturing, retail grocery stores, and school bus driving. A cross-sectional study design used a self-administered, computer-assisted questionnaire (English and Spanish) to assess sociodemographic characteristics and nine workplace exposures, within the past year. An interviewer-administered job history also was collected.
RESULTS: Twelve hundred eighty-two workers (72%) completed the survey: 36% women, 23% Latino, 39% black, 24% white, and 48% born outside the US. The prevalence of high exposures ranged from 21% (chemicals) to 39% (neck strain). Forty-six percent reported three or more high exposures. Exposure reporting varied among sociodemographic groups. Some of the disparities were explained by the jobs held by different groups, but after statistically controlling for job, many disparities remained.
CONCLUSIONS: Sociodemographic characteristics should be considered when conducting exposure assessments using questionnaires. More research is needed to understand how social characteristics may influence exposures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17979135     DOI: 10.1002/ajim.20529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  18 in total

1.  Methods for the scientific study of discrimination and health: an ecosocial approach.

Authors:  Nancy Krieger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Identifying gender differences in reported occupational information from three US population-based case-control studies.

Authors:  Sarah J Locke; Joanne S Colt; Patricia A Stewart; Karla R Armenti; Dalsu Baris; Aaron Blair; James R Cerhan; Wong-Ho Chow; Wendy Cozen; Faith Davis; Anneclaire J De Roos; Patricia Hartge; Margaret R Karagas; Alison Johnson; Mark P Purdue; Nathaniel Rothman; Kendra Schwartz; Molly Schwenn; Richard Severson; Debra T Silverman; Melissa C Friesen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Reducing hazardous cleaning product use: a collaborative effort.

Authors:  Elise Pechter; Lenore S Azaroff; Isabel López; Marcy Goldstein-Gelb
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  The association of workplace hazards and smoking in a U.S. multiethnic working-class population.

Authors:  Cassandra A Okechukwu; Nancy Krieger; Jarvis Chen; Glorian Sorensen; Yi Li; Elizabeth M Barbeau
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 5.  State of the evidence 2017: an update on the connection between breast cancer and the environment.

Authors:  Janet M Gray; Sharima Rasanayagam; Connie Engel; Jeanne Rizzo
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 5.984

6.  Cigarette smoking in building trades workers: the impact of work environment.

Authors:  Dal Lae Chin; Oisaeng Hong; Marion Gillen; Michael N Bates; Cassandra A Okechukwu
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 2.214

7.  Differences in Patterns of Mortality Between Foreign-Born and Native-Born Workers Due to Fatal Occupational Injury in the USA from 2003 to 2010.

Authors:  Christen G Byler; W Courtland Robinson
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2018-02

Review 8.  Work and its role in shaping the social gradient in health.

Authors:  Jane E Clougherty; Kerry Souza; Mark R Cullen
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Promoting integrated approaches to reducing health inequities among low-income workers: applying a social ecological framework.

Authors:  Sherry L Baron; Sharon Beard; Letitia K Davis; Linda Delp; Linda Forst; Andrea Kidd-Taylor; Amy K Liebman; Laura Linnan; Laura Punnett; Laura S Welch
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 10.  Effects of social, economic, and labor policies on occupational health disparities.

Authors:  Carlos Eduardo Siqueira; Megan Gaydos; Celeste Monforton; Craig Slatin; Liz Borkowski; Peter Dooley; Amy Liebman; Erica Rosenberg; Glenn Shor; Matthew Keifer
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 2.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.