BACKGROUND: Nearly one of every three workers in the United States is low-income. Low-income populations have a lower life expectancy and greater rates of chronic diseases compared to those with higher incomes. Low- income workers face hazards in their workplaces as well as in their communities. Developing integrated public health programs that address these combined health hazards, especially the interaction of occupational and non-occupational risk factors, can promote greater health equity. METHODS: We apply a social-ecological perspective in considering ways to improve the health of the low-income working population through integrated health protection and health promotion programs initiated in four different settings: the worksite, state and local health departments, community health centers, and community-based organizations. RESULTS: Examples of successful approaches to developing integrated programs are presented in each of these settings. These examples illustrate several complementary venues for public health programs that consider the complex interplay between work-related and non work-related factors, that integrate health protection with health promotion and that are delivered at multiple levels to improve health for low-income workers. CONCLUSIONS: Whether at the workplace or in the community, employers, workers, labor and community advocates, in partnership with public health practitioners, can deliver comprehensive and integrated health protection and health promotion programs. Recommendations for improved research, training, and coordination among health departments, health practitioners, worksites and community organizations are proposed.
BACKGROUND: Nearly one of every three workers in the United States is low-income. Low-income populations have a lower life expectancy and greater rates of chronic diseases compared to those with higher incomes. Low- income workers face hazards in their workplaces as well as in their communities. Developing integrated public health programs that address these combined health hazards, especially the interaction of occupational and non-occupational risk factors, can promote greater health equity. METHODS: We apply a social-ecological perspective in considering ways to improve the health of the low-income working population through integrated health protection and health promotion programs initiated in four different settings: the worksite, state and local health departments, community health centers, and community-based organizations. RESULTS: Examples of successful approaches to developing integrated programs are presented in each of these settings. These examples illustrate several complementary venues for public health programs that consider the complex interplay between work-related and non work-related factors, that integrate health protection with health promotion and that are delivered at multiple levels to improve health for low-income workers. CONCLUSIONS: Whether at the workplace or in the community, employers, workers, labor and community advocates, in partnership with public health practitioners, can deliver comprehensive and integrated health protection and health promotion programs. Recommendations for improved research, training, and coordination among health departments, health practitioners, worksites and community organizations are proposed.
Authors: John May; Lynae Hawkes; Amanda Jones; Patrick Burdick; Barbara Ginley; Blanca Santiago; Michael Rowland Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Meredith Minkler; Pam Tau Lee; Alex Tom; Charlotte Chang; Alvaro Morales; Shaw San Liu; Alicia Salvatore; Robin Baker; Feiyi Chen; Rajiv Bhatia; Niklas Krause Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Christina A Clarke; Tim Miller; Ellen T Chang; Daixin Yin; Myles Cockburn; Scarlett L Gomez Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2010-02-12 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Mahasin S Mujahid; Ana V Diez Roux; Jeffrey D Morenoff; Trivellore E Raghunathan; Richard S Cooper; Hanyu Ni; Steven Shea Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Laura Linnan; Mike Bowling; Jennifer Childress; Garry Lindsay; Carter Blakey; Stephanie Pronk; Sharon Wieker; Penelope Royall Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2007-11-29 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Meagan C Brown; Jeffrey R Harris; Kristen Hammerback; Marlana J Kohn; Amanda T Parrish; Gary K Chan; India J Ornelas; Christian D Helfrich; Peggy A Hannon Journal: Am J Health Promot Date: 2020-02-20
Authors: Lisa A Jaegers; Syed Omar Ahmad; Gregory Scheetz; Emily Bixler; Saketh Nadimpalli; Ellen Barnidge; Ian M Katz; Michael G Vaughn; Monica M Matthieu Journal: Am J Occup Ther Date: 2020 May/Jun
Authors: Meredith Minkler; Alicia L Salvatore; Charlotte Chang; Megan Gaydos; Shaw San Liu; Pam Tau Lee; Alex Tom; Rajiv Bhatia; Niklas Krause Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-04-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Andrea L Steege; Sherry L Baron; Suzanne M Marsh; Cammie Chaumont Menéndez; John R Myers Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Glorian Sorensen; Deborah L McLellan; Erika L Sabbath; Jack T Dennerlein; Eve M Nagler; David A Hurtado; Nicolaas P Pronk; Gregory R Wagner Journal: Prev Med Date: 2016-08-12 Impact factor: 4.018