Literature DB >> 17976167

Ascomycetous yeast species recovered from grapes damaged by honeydew and sour rot.

A Barata1, F Seborro, C Belloch, M Malfeito-Ferreira, V Loureiro.   

Abstract

AIMS: To identify ascomycetous yeasts recovered from sound and damaged grapes by the presence of honeydew or sour rot. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In sound grapes, the mean yeast counts ranged from 3.20 +/- 1.04 log CFU g(-1) to 5.87 +/- 0.64 log CFU g(-1). In honeydew grapes, the mean counts ranged from 3.88 +/- 0.80 log CFU g(-1) to 6.64 +/- 0.77 log CFU g(-1). In sour rot grapes counts varied between 6.34 +/- 1.03 and 7.68 +/- 0.38 logCFU g(-1). Hanseniaspora uvarum was the most frequent species from sound samples. In both types of damage, the most frequent species were Candida vanderwaltii, H. uvarum and Zygoascus hellenicus. The latter species was recovered in high frequency because of the utilization of the selective medium DBDM (Dekkera/Brettanomyces differential medium). The scarce isolation frequency of the wine spoilage species Zygosaccharomyces bailii (in sour rotten grapes) and Zygosaccharomyces bisporus (in honeydew affected grapes) could only be demonstrated by the use of the selective medium ZDM (Zygosaccharomyces differential medium).
CONCLUSIONS: The isolation of several species only from damaged grapes indicates that damage constituted the main factor determining yeast diversity. The utilization of selective media is required for eliciting the recovery of potentially wine spoilage species. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The impact of damaged grapes in the yeast ecology of grapes has been underestimated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17976167     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03631.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  10 in total

1.  New insights into the ecological interaction between grape berry microorganisms and Drosophila flies during the development of sour rot.

Authors:  André Barata; Sara Correia Santos; Manuel Malfeito-Ferreira; Virgílio Loureiro
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Purification and properties of phenolic acid decarboxylase from Candida guilliermondii.

Authors:  Hui-Kai Huang; Masamichi Tokashiki; Sayaka Maeno; Shoko Onaga; Toki Taira; Susumu Ito
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.346

3.  Year, Location, and Variety Impact on Grape-Associated Mycobiota of Arkansas-Grown Wine Grapes for Wine Production.

Authors:  Natacha Cureau; Renee Threlfall; Daya Marasini; Laura Lavefve; Franck Carbonero
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  MALDI-TOF MS Supplementary database for species identification employing the yeast diversity encountered on southern Brazil grapes.

Authors:  Bruna Carla Agustini; Gildo Almeida da Silva; Tania Maria Bordin Bonfim
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 2.099

5.  Unravelling the diversity of grapevine microbiome.

Authors:  Cátia Pinto; Diogo Pinho; Susana Sousa; Miguel Pinheiro; Conceição Egas; Ana C Gomes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Persistence of Two Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts (Hanseniaspora and Starmerella) in the Cellar.

Authors:  Cédric Grangeteau; Daniel Gerhards; Christian von Wallbrunn; Hervé Alexandre; Sandrine Rousseaux; Michèle Guilloux-Benatier
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Wine microbiology is driven by vineyard and winery anthropogenic factors.

Authors:  Cédric Grangeteau; Chloé Roullier-Gall; Sandrine Rousseaux; Régis D Gougeon; Philippe Schmitt-Kopplin; Hervé Alexandre; Michèle Guilloux-Benatier
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 5.813

8.  Diversity and spoilage potential of microbial communities associated with grape sour rot in eastern coastal areas of China.

Authors:  Huanhuan Gao; Xiangtian Yin; Xilong Jiang; Hongmei Shi; Yang Yang; Chaoping Wang; Xiaoyan Dai; Yingchun Chen; Xinying Wu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  The vineyard yeast microbiome, a mixed model microbial map.

Authors:  Mathabatha Evodia Setati; Daniel Jacobson; Ursula-Claire Andong; Florian Franz Bauer; Florian Bauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Unraveling the Enzymatic Basis of Wine "Flavorome": A Phylo-Functional Study of Wine Related Yeast Species.

Authors:  Ignacio Belda; Javier Ruiz; Ana Alastruey-Izquierdo; Eva Navascués; Domingo Marquina; Antonio Santos
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 5.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.