Literature DB >> 22438040

New insights into the ecological interaction between grape berry microorganisms and Drosophila flies during the development of sour rot.

André Barata1, Sara Correia Santos, Manuel Malfeito-Ferreira, Virgílio Loureiro.   

Abstract

In this work, we studied the ecological interactions between grape berry microorganisms and Drosophila sp. flies involved in sour rot disease during grape ripening. After veráison the total microbial counts of grape berries affected by sour rot increased from about 2 log CFU/g of berries to more than 7 log CFU/g. Berry damage provoked a clear shift in yeast diversity from basidiomycetes to ascomycetous fermentative species. The latter were mostly Pichia terricola, Hanseniaspora uvarum, Candida zemplinina, and Zygoascus hellenicus. However, these species were not able to produce the metabolites characteristic of sour rot (gluconic and acetic acids) in inoculated berries. On the contrary, the acetic acid bacteria Gluconacetobacter saccharivorans produced high levels of these acids, mainly when berries were incubated in the presence of the insect Drosophila sp. Sour rot was not observed when grape bunches were physically separated from insects, even when berries were artificially injured. The wounds made in berry skin healed in the absence of insects, thus preventing the development of sour rot. Therefore, in the vineyard, the induction of sour rot depends on the contamination of wounded berries by a microbial consortium--yeasts and acetic acid bacteria--transported by drosophilid insects which disseminate sour rot among damaged berries. In the absence of these insects, plant defense mechanisms are effective and lead to skin healing, preventing disease spread. Thus, we showed that Drosophila sp. act as a vector for microorganisms associated with grape sour rot disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22438040     DOI: 10.1007/s00248-012-0041-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  27 in total

1.  Identification of acetic acid bacteria by RFLP of PCR-amplified 16S rDNA and 16S-23S rDNA intergenic spacer.

Authors:  A Ruiz; M Poblet; A Mas; J M Guillamón
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.747

2.  On the origins of wine yeast.

Authors:  R Mortimer; M Polsinelli
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.992

3.  Identification of odors from overripe mango that attract vinegar flies, Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Junwei Zhu; Kye-Chung Park; Thomas C Baker
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Development and use of a new medium to detect yeasts of the genera Dekkera/Brettanomyces.

Authors:  N Rodrigues; G Gonçalves; S Pereira-da-Silva; M Malfeito-Ferreira; V Loureiro
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.772

5.  Geographical distribution and diversity of bacteria associated with natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Vanessa Corby-Harris; Ana Clara Pontaroli; Lawrence J Shimkets; Jeffrey L Bennetzen; Kristin E Habel; Daniel E L Promislow
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  A differential medium for the enumeration of the spoilage yeast Zygosaccharomyces bailii in wine.

Authors:  D Schuller; M Côrte-Real; C Leão
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.077

7.  Application of molecular methods for routine identification of acetic acid bacteria.

Authors:  Angel González; José Manuel Guillamón; Albert Mas; Montse Poblet
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2005-12-28       Impact factor: 5.277

8.  Innate immune homeostasis by the homeobox gene caudal and commensal-gut mutualism in Drosophila.

Authors:  Ji-Hwan Ryu; Sung-Hee Kim; Hyo-Young Lee; Jin Young Bai; Young-Do Nam; Jin-Woo Bae; Dong Gun Lee; Seung Chul Shin; Eun-Mi Ha; Won-Jae Lee
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Phylogenetic characterization of two novel commensal bacteria involved with innate immune homeostasis in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Seong Woon Roh; Young-Do Nam; Ho-Won Chang; Kyoung-Ho Kim; Min-Soo Kim; Ji-Hwan Ryu; Sung-Hee Kim; Won-Jae Lee; Jin-Woo Bae
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Coadaptation ofDrosophila and yeasts in their natural habitat.

Authors:  W T Starmer; J C Fogleman
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 2.626

View more
  21 in total

1.  The Host as the Driver of the Microbiota in the Gut and External Environment of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Adam C-N Wong; Yuan Luo; Xiangfeng Jing; Soeren Franzenburg; Alyssa Bost; Angela E Douglas
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Friend, foe or food? Recognition and the role of antimicrobial peptides in gut immunity and Drosophila-microbe interactions.

Authors:  Nichole A Broderick
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  A genomic investigation of ecological differentiation between free-living and Drosophila-associated bacteria.

Authors:  Nathan J Winans; Alec Walter; Bessem Chouaia; John M Chaston; Angela E Douglas; Peter D Newell
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Drosophila melanogaster establishes a species-specific mutualistic interaction with stable gut-colonizing bacteria.

Authors:  Inês S Pais; Rita S Valente; Marta Sporniak; Luis Teixeira
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  A Functional Analysis of the Purine Salvage Pathway in Acetobacter fabarum.

Authors:  Peter D Newell; Leticia M Preciado; Christopher G Murphy
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.476

6.  How gut microbiome interactions affect nutritional traits of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  John G McMullen; Grace Peters-Schulze; Jingwei Cai; Andrew D Patterson; Angela E Douglas
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  The vineyard yeast microbiome, a mixed model microbial map.

Authors:  Mathabatha Evodia Setati; Daniel Jacobson; Ursula-Claire Andong; Florian Franz Bauer; Florian Bauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Host species and environmental effects on bacterial communities associated with Drosophila in the laboratory and in the natural environment.

Authors:  Fabian Staubach; John F Baines; Sven Künzel; Elisabeth M Bik; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Complexity and Dynamics of the Winemaking Bacterial Communities in Berries, Musts, and Wines from Apulian Grape Cultivars through Time and Space.

Authors:  Marinella Marzano; Bruno Fosso; Caterina Manzari; Francesco Grieco; Marianna Intranuovo; Giuseppe Cozzi; Giuseppina Mulè; Gaetano Scioscia; Gabriel Valiente; Apollonia Tullo; Elisabetta Sbisà; Graziano Pesole; Monica Santamaria
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A new family and genus in Dothideales for Aureobasidium-like species isolated from house dust.

Authors:  Zoë Humphries; Keith A Seifert; Yuuri Hirooka; Cobus M Visagie
Journal:  IMA Fungus       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.515

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.