Literature DB >> 11268864

Delivery room resuscitation decisions for extremely low birthweight infants in California.

J C Partridge1, H Freeman, E Weiss, A M Martinez.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize physician-parent counseling and delivery room resuscitation of extremely low birthweight (ELBW) infants. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of 473 California neonatologists detailing counseling patterns, resuscitation thresholds, and acceptance of parental decision making.
RESULTS: The response rate was 61%. After 23 weeks' gestation, > 80% of neonatologists counseled parents expecting ELBW infants. All (> 99%) counseled parents about mortality; > 25% reported not discussing limiting resuscitation or death despite resuscitation. Decisions to limit resuscitation were affected by congenital anomalies, parents' wishes, or perceptions of pain, suffering, and quality of life. Nearly 70% of neonatologists supported parental decision making at 22 to 23 weeks, whereas 66% to 74% responded that parents should not be allowed to make nonresuscitation decisions after 26 weeks. Median resuscitation thresholds were 23 weeks (range 20-28) and 500 g (range 350-1000).
CONCLUSIONS: Neonatologists' failure to discuss nonresuscitation options, variations in resuscitation thresholds, and unwillingness to accept nonresuscitation decisions for more mature ELBW infants may restrict parental decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11268864     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7200477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinatol        ISSN: 0743-8346            Impact factor:   2.521


  15 in total

Review 1.  Parental refusal of medical treatment for a newborn.

Authors:  John J Paris; Michael D Schreiber; Michael P Moreland
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2007

2.  A qualitative study of predelivery counselling for extreme prematurity.

Authors:  Elizabeth Young; Ellen Tsai; Anne O'Riordan
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.253

3.  The influence of resuscitation preferences on obstetrical management of periviable deliveries.

Authors:  B Tucker Edmonds; F McKenzie; K S Hendrix; S M Perkins; G D Zimet
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 2.521

4.  Parent decision making for life support for extremely premature infants: from the prenatal through end-of-life period.

Authors:  Teresa T Moro; Karen Kavanaugh; Teresa A Savage; Maria R Reyes; Robert E Kimura; Rama Bhat
Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2011 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.638

5.  [Not Available].

Authors:  Thierry Daboval
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.253

6.  A national survey of obstetricians' attitudes toward and practice of periviable intervention.

Authors:  B Tucker Edmonds; F McKenzie; V Farrow; G Raglan; J Schulkin
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 2.521

7.  Comparing neonatal morbidity and mortality estimates across specialty in periviable counseling.

Authors:  Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds; Fatima McKenzie; Janet E Panoch; Richard M Frankel
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2014-11-14

8.  Intensive care for extreme prematurity--moving beyond gestational age.

Authors:  Jon E Tyson; Nehal A Parikh; John Langer; Charles Green; Rosemary D Higgins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  A Pilot Study of Neonatologists' Decision-Making Roles in Delivery Room Resuscitation Counseling for Periviable Births.

Authors:  Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds; Fatima McKenzie; Janet E Panoch; Douglas B White; Amber E Barnato
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2016-07

10.  Supporting parents' decision making surrounding the anticipated birth of an extremely premature infant.

Authors:  Karen Kavanaugh; Teresa T Moro; Teresa A Savage; Maria Reyes; Marguerite Wydra
Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2009 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.