Literature DB >> 17975526

Self-monitoring of blood glucose among adults with diabetes--United States, 1997-2006.

.   

Abstract

Blood-glucose control is critical for managing diabetes and preventing diabetes-related complications such as cardiovascular disease, retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy. In addition to recommending that patients with diabetes have a glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) measurement at least two times a year, the American Diabetes Association recommends self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) as an integral part of diabetes management for patients who are treated with insulin and as a useful component for achieving glycemic goals for patients who use oral medications or medical nutrition therapy. One of the Healthy People 2010 national objectives is to increase to 61% the proportion of persons with diabetes who perform SMBG at least once a day (objective 5-17). To estimate the rates of SMBG and to track the progress of states during 1997-2006, CDC analyzed data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) for that period. This report summarizes the findings of that analysis, which indicated that the proportion of adults with diabetes who check their blood glucose at least once a day increased at the national level, and 25 of the 38 states examined had statistically significant rate increases from 1997 to 2006. In 2006, the daily SMBG rate was 63.4% among all adults with diabetes and 86.7% among those treated with insulin. Collaborations to ensure adequate health insurance coverage, diabetes education and counseling to encourage more intensive medical care and self-management practices, and continued surveillance measures to track changes in SMBG rates are needed to improve and monitor SMBG trends.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17975526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep        ISSN: 0149-2195            Impact factor:   17.586


  9 in total

1.  Use of an automated bolus calculator reduces fear of hypoglycemia and improves confidence in dosage accuracy in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus treated with multiple daily insulin injections.

Authors:  Katharine Barnard; Christopher Parkin; Amanda Young; Mansoor Ashraf
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-01-01

2.  Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  David B Sacks; Mark Arnold; George L Bakris; David E Bruns; Andrea Rita Horvath; M Sue Kirkman; Ake Lernmark; Boyd E Metzger; David M Nathan
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  The impact of health literacy on self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with diabetes receiving care in an inner-city hospital.

Authors:  Nkechi Mbaezue; Robert Mayberry; Julie Gazmararian; Alexander Quarshie; Chinedu Ivonye; Michael Heisler
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.798

4.  "Never events": hepatitis B outbreaks and patient notifications resulting from unsafe practices during assisted monitoring of blood glucose, 2009-2010.

Authors:  Nicola D Thompson; Melissa K Schaefer
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-11-01

5.  The relationships between common measures of glucose meter performance.

Authors:  Daniel R Wilmoth
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-09-01

6.  Recommendations for standardizing glucose reporting and analysis to optimize clinical decision making in diabetes: the ambulatory glucose profile.

Authors:  Richard M Bergenstal; Andrew J Ahmann; Timothy Bailey; Roy W Beck; Joan Bissen; Bruce Buckingham; Larry Deeb; Robert H Dolin; Satish K Garg; Robin Goland; Irl B Hirsch; David C Klonoff; Davida F Kruger; Glenn Matfin; Roger S Mazze; Beth A Olson; Christopher Parkin; Anne Peters; Margaret A Powers; Henry Rodriguez; Phil Southerland; Ellie S Strock; William Tamborlane; David M Wesley
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-03-01

7.  Adherence to self-monitoring of blood glucose in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: current status and influential factors based on electronic questionnaires.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Jun-Fei Luo; Lin Qi; Qing Long; Jia Guo; Hong-Hong Wang
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 2.711

8.  Effective assessment of diabetes control using personal glucometers (CONTOURLINK, Bayer, Germany; CALLA, Wellion, Austria; LINUS, Agamatrix, USA).

Authors:  R Chlup; B Doubravova; J Bartek; J Zapletalova; O Krystynik; V Prochazka
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.434

9.  Infection Transmission Associated with Point of Care Testing and the Laboratory's Role in Risk Reduction.

Authors:  Sharon M Geaghan
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2014-09-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.