Literature DB >> 17975128

Comparison between voluntary and stimulated contractions of the quadriceps femoris for growth hormone response and muscle damage.

Marc Jubeau1, Alessandro Sartorio, Pier Giulio Marinone, Fiorenza Agosti, Jacques Van Hoecke, Kazunori Nosaka, Nicola A Maffiuletti.   

Abstract

This study aimed to compare voluntary and stimulated exercise for changes in muscle strength, growth hormone (GH), blood lactate, and markers of muscle damage. Nine healthy men had two leg press exercise bouts separated by 2 wk. In the first bout, the quadriceps muscles were stimulated by biphasic rectangular pulses (75 Hz, duration 400 mus, on-off ratio 6.25-20 s) with current amplitude being consistently increased throughout 40 contractions at maximal tolerable level. In the second bout, 40 voluntary isometric contractions were performed at the same leg press force output as the first bout. Maximal voluntary isometric strength was measured before and after the bouts, and serum GH and blood lactate concentrations were measured before, during, and after exercise. Serum creatine kinase (CK) activity and muscle soreness were assessed before, immediately after, and 24, 48, and 72 h after exercise. Maximal voluntary strength decreased significantly (P < 0.05) after both bouts, but the magnitude of the decrease was significantly (P < 0.05) greater for the stimulated contractions (-22%) compared with the voluntary contractions (-9%). Increases in serum GH and lactate concentrations were significantly (P < 0.05) larger after the stimulation compared with the voluntary exercise. Increases in serum CK activity and muscle soreness were also significantly (P < 0.05) greater for the stimulation than voluntary exercise. It was concluded that a single bout of electrical stimulation exercise resulted in greater GH response and muscle damage than voluntary exercise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17975128     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00335.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  33 in total

Review 1.  Physiological and methodological considerations for the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Nicola A Maffiuletti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Muscle oxygenation of vastus lateralis and medialis muscles during alternating and pulsed current electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Aldayel; Makii Muthalib; Marc Jubeau; Michael McGuigan; Kazunori Nosaka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Growth hormone responses to acute resistance exercise with vascular restriction in young and old men.

Authors:  Todd M Manini; Joshua F Yarrow; Thomas W Buford; Brian C Clark; Christine F Conover; Stephen E Borst
Journal:  Growth Horm IGF Res       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 2.372

4.  [(Very) high Creatinkinase concentration after exertional whole-body electromyostimulation application: health risks and longitudinal adaptations].

Authors:  Wolfgang Kemmler; Marc Teschler; Michael Bebenek; Simon von Stengel
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2015-10-26

5.  Less indication of muscle damage in the second than initial electrical muscle stimulation bout consisting of isometric contractions of the knee extensors.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Aldayel; Marc Jubeau; Michael R McGuigan; Kazunori Nosaka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 6.  Muscle damage induced by electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Kazunori Nosaka; Abdulaziz Aldayel; Marc Jubeau; Trevor C Chen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 7.  Is high-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation a suitable tool for muscle performance improvement in both healthy humans and athletes?

Authors:  Julien Gondin; Patrick J Cozzone; David Bendahan
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Comparison in muscle damage between maximal voluntary and electrically evoked isometric contractions of the elbow flexors.

Authors:  Marc Jubeau; Makii Muthalib; Guillaume Y Millet; Nicola A Maffiuletti; Kazunori Nosaka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Chronic effects of superimposed electromyostimulation during cycling on aerobic and anaerobic capacity.

Authors:  Sebastian Mathes; Niklas Lehnen; Tobias Link; Wilhelm Bloch; Joachim Mester; Patrick Wahl
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Effects of a Whole-Body Electrostimulation Program on Strength, Sprinting, Jumping, and Kicking Capacity in Elite Soccer Players.

Authors:  Andre Filipovic; Marijke Grau; Heinz Kleinöder; Philipp Zimmer; Wildor Hollmann; Wilhelm Bloch
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.