BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The association of MR imaging abnormalities with clinical disability in multiple sclerosis (MS) has been disappointing. This association might be improved by imaging specific functional systems in the central nervous system-for example, the motor system in a patient with weakness. Our aim was to assess the relationship between muscle strength in MS and corticospinal tract (CST) abnormalities detected with multimodality MR imaging of the brain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 47 individuals with MS, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) at 3T was used to reconstruct the intracranial CSTs. Tract profiles depicted the variation in T2 relaxation time, magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), and DTI-derived indices (fractional anisotropy and diffusivity) as a function of normalized position along the tract. Brain parenchymal fraction was calculated as a normalized measure of brain volume. Stepwise linear regression modeling was used to determine the MR imaging indices most closely related to ankle dorsiflexion and hip flexion strength assessed with quantitative dynamometry. RESULTS: Individuals with MS were significantly weak: Average ankle strength fell 1.7 SDs below the age-, handedness-, and sex-corrected healthy mean. Brain parenchymal fraction was not associated with weakness. A parsimonious model that includes MTR in the brain stem and MS clinical subtype explained 30%-45% of the variance in ankle and hip strength. The model was successfully applied to scans and strength data from the same individuals at an earlier time point. CONCLUSION: MR imaging abnormalities specific to the motor tract are associated with clinical dysfunction related to that tract. The relevant abnormalities are found in the brain stem, distant from the periventricular inflammatory lesions that are common in MS. This suggests that neurodegeneration, rather than primary inflammation, at least partially explains the findings.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The association of MR imaging abnormalities with clinical disability in multiple sclerosis (MS) has been disappointing. This association might be improved by imaging specific functional systems in the central nervous system-for example, the motor system in a patient with weakness. Our aim was to assess the relationship between muscle strength in MS and corticospinal tract (CST) abnormalities detected with multimodality MR imaging of the brain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 47 individuals with MS, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) at 3T was used to reconstruct the intracranial CSTs. Tract profiles depicted the variation in T2 relaxation time, magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), and DTI-derived indices (fractional anisotropy and diffusivity) as a function of normalized position along the tract. Brain parenchymal fraction was calculated as a normalized measure of brain volume. Stepwise linear regression modeling was used to determine the MR imaging indices most closely related to ankle dorsiflexion and hip flexion strength assessed with quantitative dynamometry. RESULTS: Individuals with MS were significantly weak: Average ankle strength fell 1.7 SDs below the age-, handedness-, and sex-corrected healthy mean. Brain parenchymal fraction was not associated with weakness. A parsimonious model that includes MTR in the brain stem and MS clinical subtype explained 30%-45% of the variance in ankle and hip strength. The model was successfully applied to scans and strength data from the same individuals at an earlier time point. CONCLUSION: MR imaging abnormalities specific to the motor tract are associated with clinical dysfunction related to that tract. The relevant abnormalities are found in the brain stem, distant from the periventricular inflammatory lesions that are common in MS. This suggests that neurodegeneration, rather than primary inflammation, at least partially explains the findings.
Authors: Stephen M Smith; Yongyue Zhang; Mark Jenkinson; Jacqueline Chen; P M Matthews; Antonio Federico; Nicola De Stefano Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2004 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Daniel S Reich; Seth A Smith; Kathleen M Zackowski; Eliza M Gordon-Lipkin; Craig K Jones; Jonathan A D Farrell; Susumu Mori; Peter C M van Zijl; Peter A Calabresi Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2007-08-15 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Patrizia Pantano; Caterina Mainero; Gian Domenico Iannetti; Francesca Caramia; Silvia Di Legge; Maria Cristina Piattella; Carlo Pozzilli; Luigi Bozzao; Gian Luigi Lenzi Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Claudia A M Wheeler-Kingshott; Simon J Hickman; Geoffrey J M Parker; Olga Ciccarelli; Mark R Symms; David H Miller; Gareth J Barker Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Hormuzdiyar H Dasenbrock; Seth A Smith; Arzu Ozturk; Sheena K Farrell; Peter A Calabresi; Daniel S Reich Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Caroline A Sage; Wim Van Hecke; Ronald Peeters; Jan Sijbers; Wim Robberecht; Paul Parizel; Guy Marchal; Alexander Leemans; Stefan Sunaert Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Jeff Goldsmith; Brian Caffo; Ciprian Crainiceanu; Daniel Reich; Yong Du; Craig Hendrix Journal: Ann Appl Stat Date: 2011-01-01 Impact factor: 2.083
Authors: Joanne M Wagner; Theodore R Kremer; Linda R Van Dillen; Robert T Naismith Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Kathleen M Zackowski; Seth A Smith; Daniel S Reich; Eliza Gordon-Lipkin; BettyAnn A Chodkowski; Divya R Sambandan; Michael Shteyman; Amy J Bastian; Peter C van Zijl; Peter A Calabresi Journal: Brain Date: 2009-03-18 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Nikos Gorgoraptis; Claudia A M Wheeler-Kingshott; Thomas M Jenkins; Daniel R Altmann; David H Miller; Alan J Thompson; Olga Ciccarelli Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2010-03-09 Impact factor: 6.312