Literature DB >> 17974318

Multisensory recognition of actively explored objects.

Marc O Ernst1, Fiona N Newell.   

Abstract

Shape recognition can be achieved through vision or touch, raising the issue of how this information is shared across modalities. Here we provide a short review of previous findings on cross-modal object recognition and we provide new empirical data on multisensory recognition of actively explored objects. It was previously shown that, similar to vision, haptic recognition of objects fixed in space is orientation specific and that cross-modal object recognition performance was relatively efficient when these views of the objects were matched across the sensory modalities (Newell, Ernst, Tjan, & Bülthoff, 2001). For actively explored (i.e., spatially unconstrained) objects, we now found a cost in cross-modal relative to within-modal recognition performance. At first, this may seem to be in contrast to findings by Newell et al. (2001). However, a detailed video analysis of the visual and haptic exploration behaviour during learning and recognition revealed that one view of the objects was predominantly explored relative to all others. Thus, active visual and haptic exploration is not balanced across object views. The cost in recognition performance across modalities for actively explored objects could be attributed to the fact that the predominantly learned object view was not appropriately matched between learning and recognition test in the cross-modal conditions. Thus, it seems that participants naturally adopt an exploration strategy during visual and haptic object learning that involves constraining the orientation of the objects. Although this strategy ensures good within-modal performance, it is not optimal for achieving the best recognition performance across modalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17974318     DOI: 10.1037/cjep2007025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1196-1961


  7 in total

1.  Cross-modal visuo-haptic mental rotation: comparing objects between senses.

Authors:  Robert Volcic; Maarten W A Wijntjes; Erik C Kool; Astrid M L Kappers
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  From CT scanning to 3-D printing technology for the preoperative planning in laparoscopic splenectomy.

Authors:  Andrea Pietrabissa; Stefania Marconi; Andrea Peri; Luigi Pugliese; Emma Cavazzi; Alessio Vinci; Marta Botti; Ferdinando Auricchio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Isolating shape from semantics in haptic-visual priming.

Authors:  Ana Pesquita; Allison A Brennan; James T Enns; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Occupants' Perceptions of Amenity and Efficiency for Verification of Spatial Design Adequacy.

Authors:  Sangwon Lee; Kwangyun Wohn
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Differences in adults' spatial scaling based on visual or haptic information.

Authors:  Magdalena Szubielska; Marta Szewczyk; Wenke Möhring
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2021-12-28

6.  Blindfolded adults use mental transformation strategies for spatial scaling of tactile maps.

Authors:  Magdalena Szubielska; Wenke Möhring
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Haptic exploration improves performance of a laparoscopic training task.

Authors:  H Jaap Bonjer; Tim Horeman; Roelf R Postema; Leonie A van Gastel; Sem F Hardon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.584

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.