Literature DB >> 17973341

Use of stochastic simulations to investigate the power and design of a whole genome association study using single nucleotide polymorphism arrays in farm animals.

Benoît Auvray1, Ken G Dodds.   

Abstract

This paper presents a quick, easy to implement and versatile way of using stochastic simulations to investigate the power and design of using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays for genome-wide association studies in farm animals. It illustrates the methodology by discussing a small example where 6 experimental designs are considered to analyse the same resource consisting of 6,006 animals with pedigree and phenotypic records: (1) genotyping the 30 most widely used sires in the population and all of their progeny (515 animals in total), (2) genotyping the 100 most widely used sires in the population and all of their progeny (1,102 animals in total), genotyping respectively (3) 515 and (4) 1,102 animals selected randomly or genotyping respectively (5) 515 and (6) 1,102 animals from the tails of the phenotypic distribution. Given the resource at hand, designs where the extreme animals are genotyped perform the best, followed by designs selecting animals at random. Designs where sires and their progeny are genotyped perform the worst, as even genotyping the 100 most widely used sires and their progeny is not as powerful of genotyping 515 extreme animals.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17973341      PMCID: PMC2064951          DOI: 10.1631/jzus.2007.B0802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B        ISSN: 1673-1581            Impact factor:   3.066


  6 in total

1.  Power of selective genotyping in genetic association analyses of quantitative traits.

Authors:  S Van Gestel; J J Houwing-Duistermaat; R Adolfsson; C M van Duijn; C Van Broeckhoven
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.805

2.  What SNP genotyping errors are most costly for genetic association studies?

Authors:  Sun Jung Kang; Derek Gordon; Stephen J Finch
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 3.  Determinants of the success of whole-genome association testing.

Authors:  Andrew G Clark; Eric Boerwinkle; James Hixson; Charles F Sing
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Computing power in case-control association studies through the use of quadratic approximations: application to meta-statistics.

Authors:  M Guedj; E Della-Chiesa; F Picard; G Nuel
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2006-10-09       Impact factor: 1.670

Review 5.  Prospects and pitfalls in whole genome association studies.

Authors:  Robert W Lawrence; David M Evans; Lon R Cardon
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  A validated whole-genome association study of efficient food conversion in cattle.

Authors:  W Barendse; A Reverter; R J Bunch; B E Harrison; W Barris; M B Thomas
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 4.562

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.