Literature DB >> 17973098

Neuromuscular and biomechanical landing performance subsequent to ipsilateral semitendinosus and gracilis autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Giampietro L Vairo1, Joseph B Myers, Timothy C Sell, Freddie H Fu, Christopher D Harner, Scott M Lephart.   

Abstract

The hamstrings musculature is a vital component of an intricate dynamic knee joint restraint mechanism. However, there is evidence based on research studies suggesting potential deficits to this complex mechanism due to donor site morbidity resulting from harvest of the ipsilateral semitendinosus and gracilis autograft (ISGA) for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The purpose of this retrospective research study was to investigate the effects of ISGA ACLR on neuromuscular and biomechanical performance during a single-leg vertical drop landing (VDL), a functional task and associated mechanism of anterior cruciate ligament disruption during physical activity. Fourteen physically active participants 22.5 +/- 4.1 years of age and 21.4 +/- 10.7 months post ISGA ACLR underwent bilateral neuromuscular, biomechanical and isokinetic strength and endurance evaluations matched to 14 control participants by sex, age, height and mass. Kinetic and kinematic data was obtained with 3-D motion analyses utilizing inverse dynamics while performing single-leg VDLs from a height of 30 cm. Integrated surface electromyography (SEMG) assessments of the quadriceps, hamstrings and gastrocnemius musculature were also conducted. Additionally, knee joint flexion strength (60 degrees s(-1)) and endurance (240 degrees s(-1)) measurements were tested via isokinetic dynamometry. No significant differences existed in hip and net summated extensor moments within or between groups. The ISGA ACLR participants recorded significantly decreased peak vertical ground reaction force (VGRF) landing upon the involved lower extremity compared to uninvolved (P = 0.028) and matched (P < 0.0001) controls. Participants having undergone ISGA ACLR also displayed greater peak hip joint flexion angles landing upon the involved lower extremity compared to uninvolved (P = 0.020) and matched (P = 0.026) controls at initial ground contact. The ISGA ACLR group furthermore exhibited increased peak hip joint flexion angles landing upon the involved lower extremity compared to uninvolved (P = 0.019) and matched (P = 0.007) controls at peak VGRF. Moreover, ISGA ALCR participants demonstrated greater peak knee (P = 0.005) and ankle (P = 0.017) joint flexion angles when landing upon the involved lower extremity compared to the matched control at peak VGRF. The ISGA ACLR group produced significantly greater reactive muscle activation of the vastus medialis (P = 0.013), vastus lateralis (P = 0.008) and medial hamstrings (P = 0.024) in the involved lower extremity compared to the matched control. The ISGA ACLR participants also exhibited greater preparatory (P = 0.033) and reactive (P = 0.022) co-contraction muscle activity of the quadriceps and hamstrings landing upon the involved lower extremity compared to the matched control. In addition, the ISGA ACLR group produced significantly less preparatory (P = 0.005) and reactive (P = 0.010) muscle activation of the gastrocnemius in the involved lower extremity compared to the uninvolved control. No significant differences were present in hamstrings muscular strength and endurance. Harvest of the ISGA for purposes of ACLR does not appear to result in significant neuromuscular, biomechanical or strength and endurance deficiencies due to donor site morbidity. However, it is evident that this specific population exhibits unique neuromuscular and biomechanical adaptations aimed to stabilize the knee previously subjected to ACL trauma and safeguard the ISGA ACLR joint. Co-contraction of quadriceps and hamstrings as well as inhibition of gastrocnemius muscle activation may serve to moderate excessive loads exposed to the intra-articular ISGA during single-leg VDLs. Furthermore, greater muscle activation of the hamstrings in conjunction with increased peak hip, knee and ankle joint flexion angles may assist in enhancing acceptance of VGRF transferred through the kinetic chain following single-leg VDLs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17973098     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-007-0427-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  50 in total

1.  A biomechanical analysis of matched bone-patellar tendon-bone and double-looped semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts.

Authors:  T W Wilson; M P Zafuta; M Zobitz
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Landing adaptations after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael J Decker; Michael R Torry; Thomas J Noonan; Amy Riviere; William I Sterett
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Effect of landing stiffness on joint kinetics and energetics in the lower extremity.

Authors:  P Devita; W A Skelly
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Reactive muscle firing of anterior cruciate ligament-injured females during functional activities.

Authors:  C B Swanik; S M Lephart; J L Giraldo; R G Demont; F H Fu
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Rupture of the quadriceps tendon after a central third patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  J C DeLee; D F Craviotto
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Reliability of an isokinetic test of muscle strength and endurance.

Authors:  L C Montgomery; L W Douglass; P A Deuster
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.751

7.  A 7-year follow-up of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon grafts for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: differences and similarities.

Authors:  Justin Roe; Leo A Pinczewski; Vivianne J Russell; Lucy J Salmon; Tomomaro Kawamata; Melvin Chew
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 8.  Isokinetic evaluation of muscular performance: implications for muscle testing and rehabilitation.

Authors:  P Kannus
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.118

9.  Lower limb stability with ACL impairment.

Authors:  S M Colby; R A Hintermeister; M R Torry; J R Steadman
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.751

10.  Functional capability is enhanced with semitendinosus than patellar tendon ACL repair.

Authors:  Thorsten Rudroff
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  30 in total

1.  Static and dynamic postural control in competitive athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and controls.

Authors:  Farshid Mohammadi; Mahyar Salavati; Behnam Akhbari; Masood Mazaheri; Mojdeh Khorrami; Hossein Negahban
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  SUSTAINED ISOMETRIC SHOULDER CONTRACTION ON MUSCULAR STRENGTH AND ENDURANCE: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL.

Authors:  Natalie L Myers; Jenny L Toonstra; Jacob S Smith; Cooper A Padgett; Tim L Uhl
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-12

Review 3.  Neuromuscular training to target deficits associated with second anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Stephanie Di Stasi; Gregory D Myer; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.751

4.  Greater fear of reinjury is related to stiffened jump-landing biomechanics and muscle activation in women after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Stephanie M Trigsted; Dane B Cook; Kristen A Pickett; Lisa Cadmus-Bertram; Warren R Dunn; David R Bell
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Knee flexor strength after ACL reconstruction: comparison between hamstring autograft, tibialis anterior allograft, and non-injured controls.

Authors:  Sarah Landes; John Nyland; Brian Elmlinger; Ed Tillett; David Caborn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-11-07       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  ACL Return to Sport Guidelines and Criteria.

Authors:  George J Davies; Eric McCarty; Matthew Provencher; Robert C Manske
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-09

7.  Hamstrings Neuromuscular Function After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  David A Sherman; Neal R Glaviano; Grant E Norte
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Altered medial versus lateral hamstring muscle activity during hop testing in female athletes 1-6 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  K Briem; A M Ragnarsdóttir; S I Árnason; T Sveinsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  Lower Limb Biomechanics During Single-Leg Landings Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Peta T Johnston; Jodie A McClelland; Kate E Webster
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 10.  Current concepts for injury prevention in athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Timothy E Hewett; Stephanie L Di Stasi; Gregory D Myer
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.