Literature DB >> 16248748

Selective and nonselective transfer: positive and negative priming in a multiple-task environment.

Jason P Leboe1, Bruce W A Whittlesea, Bruce Milliken.   

Abstract

Processing of a probe stimulus can be affected either positively or negatively by presenting a related stimulus immediately before it. According to structural accounts, such effects occur because processing of the prime activates or inhibits the mental representation of the probe before it is presented. In contrast, transfer-appropriate processing accounts suggest that success in processing a probe depends on resources made available by earlier experiences of related stimuli. The authors manipulated the similarity between the prime and probe on color, lexical status, and orthographic structure, requiring either lexical decision or color identification on each. The authors observed a complex pattern of positive and negative transfer that cannot easily be explained through activation-inhibition of mental structures. Instead, that pattern provides evidence in favor of transfer-appropriate processing.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16248748     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.1001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  6 in total

1.  Repetition costs in word identification: evaluating a stimulus-response integration account.

Authors:  Bruce Milliken; Juan Lupianez
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-12-14

2.  Neurophysiological evidence for transfer appropriate processing of memory: processing versus feature similarity.

Authors:  Haune E Schendan; Malra Kutas
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-08

Review 3.  The negative priming paradigm: An update and implications for selective attention.

Authors:  Christian Frings; Katja Kerstin Schneider; Elaine Fox
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

4.  Developing Team Cognition: A Role for Simulation.

Authors:  Rosemarie Fernandez; Sachita Shah; Elizabeth D Rosenman; Steve W J Kozlowski; Sarah Henrickson Parker; James A Grand
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.929

5.  Asymmetric switch costs as sequential difficulty effects.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; John R Anderson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  The role of task-related learned representations in explaining asymmetries in task switching.

Authors:  Ayla Barutchu; Stefanie I Becker; Olivia Carter; Robert Hester; Neil L Levy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.