BACKGROUND: Wall shear stress (WSS) has been associated with neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) following bare metal stent (BMS) implantation. Drug-eluting stents (DES) almost abolish NIH. Conversely, diabetes mellitus amplifiesNIH response. The association between WSS and arterial wall response following DES and BMS implantation in diabetic patients remains to be evaluated. METHODS: The study involved 20 diabetic patients randomized toBMS (n = 9) or sirolimus-eluting stent (SES; n = 11) implantation in native coronary arteries. A computational fluid dynamic model applied 3D intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and two-plane angiographic to measure WSS (Pa). IVUS assessments were performed post-procedure and at 9-months follow-up. The target segment encompassed the stent plus 5 mm distal and proximal edges. A total of 93 subsegments were evaluated: in-stent segments divided in three subsegments (proximal, mid and distal; n = 60) and proximal and distal edges (n = 33). RESULTS:Stent length was similar between BMS (17.4 +/- 7.3 mm) and SES (19.8 +/- 6.8 mm) groups. NIH was observed in all BMS subsegments (n = 27) versus one subsegment in the SES group (n = 33). WSS ranged from 0.52 to 4.20 Pa in the BMS and from 0.42 to 3.06 Pa in the SES group. There was no correlation between WSS and NIH in either stent group. In addition, there were no correlation between the change of external elastic membrane (EEM) or plaque growth at the edges and WSS. CONCLUSION: WSS was not associated with NIH after implantation of SES or BMS in diabetic patients. Plaque growth or the change of EEM at the edges were not associated with WSS either.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Wall shear stress (WSS) has been associated with neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) following bare metal stent (BMS) implantation. Drug-eluting stents (DES) almost abolish NIH. Conversely, diabetes mellitus amplifies NIH response. The association between WSS and arterial wall response following DES and BMS implantation in diabeticpatients remains to be evaluated. METHODS: The study involved 20 diabeticpatients randomized to BMS (n = 9) or sirolimus-eluting stent (SES; n = 11) implantation in native coronary arteries. A computational fluid dynamic model applied 3D intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and two-plane angiographic to measure WSS (Pa). IVUS assessments were performed post-procedure and at 9-months follow-up. The target segment encompassed the stent plus 5 mm distal and proximal edges. A total of 93 subsegments were evaluated: in-stent segments divided in three subsegments (proximal, mid and distal; n = 60) and proximal and distal edges (n = 33). RESULTS: Stent length was similar between BMS (17.4 +/- 7.3 mm) and SES (19.8 +/- 6.8 mm) groups. NIH was observed in all BMS subsegments (n = 27) versus one subsegment in the SES group (n = 33). WSS ranged from 0.52 to 4.20 Pa in the BMS and from 0.42 to 3.06 Pa in the SES group. There was no correlation between WSS and NIH in either stent group. In addition, there were no correlation between the change of external elastic membrane (EEM) or plaque growth at the edges and WSS. CONCLUSION: WSS was not associated with NIH after implantation of SES or BMS in diabeticpatients. Plaque growth or the change of EEM at the edges were not associated with WSS either.
Authors: J C Schuurbiers; C von Birgelen; J J Wentzel; N Bom; P W Serruys; P J de Feyter; C J Slager Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Pilar Jiménez-Quevedo; Manel Sabaté; Dominick J Angiolillo; Marco A Costa; Fernando Alfonso; Joan Antoni Gómez-Hospital; Rosana Hernández-Antolín; Camino Bañuelos; Javier Goicolea; Francisco Fernández-Avilés; Theodore Bass; Javier Escaned; Raul Moreno; Cristina Fernández; Carlos Macaya Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-05-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: C Indolfi; D Torella; L Cavuto; A M Davalli; C Coppola; G Esposito; M V Carriero; A Rapacciuolo; E Di Lorenzo; E Stabile; C Perrino; A Chieffo; F Pardo; M Chiariello Journal: Circulation Date: 2001-06-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Dominick J Angiolillo; Steven B Shoemaker; Bhaloo Desai; Hang Yuan; Ronald K Charlton; Esther Bernardo; Martin M Zenni; Luis A Guzman; Theodore A Bass; Marco A Costa Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-01-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Alexandre Abizaid; Marco A Costa; Didier Blanchard; Mariano Albertal; Hélèn Eltchaninoff; Giulio Guagliumi; Laarman Geert-Jan; Andrea S Abizaid; Amanda G M R Sousa; Egon Wuelfert; Lindeboom Wietze; J Eduardo Sousa; Patrick W Serruys; Marie-Claude Morice Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Gabriel T R Pereira; Alessio La Manna; Yasuhiro Ichibori; Armando Vergara-Martel; Bruno Ramos Nascimento; Abdul Jawwad Samdani; Davide Capodanno; Guido D'Agosta; Giacomo Gravina; Giuseppe Venuti; Corrado Tamburino; Guilherme F Attizzani Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2019-06-07 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Miao Chu; Juan Luis Gutiérrez-Chico; Yingguang Li; Emil N Holck; Su Zhang; Jiayue Huang; Zehang Li; Lianglong Chen; Evald H Christiansen; Jouke Dijkstra; Niels R Holm; Shengxian Tu Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2019-10-30 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Koki Shishido; Antonios P Antoniadis; Saeko Takahashi; Masaya Tsuda; Shingo Mizuno; Ioannis Andreou; Michail I Papafaklis; Ahmet U Coskun; Caroline O'Brien; Charles L Feldman; Shigeru Saito; Elazer R Edelman; Peter H Stone Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2016-09-14 Impact factor: 5.501