Literature DB >> 17971652

Brain stimulation in poststroke rehabilitation.

Miguel Alonso-Alonso1, Felipe Fregni, Alvaro Pascual-Leone.   

Abstract

Brain stimulation techniques provide a powerful means to modulate the function of specific neural structures, and show potential for future applications in the rehabilitation of stroke patients. Recent studies have started to translate to the bedside the body of data gathered over the last few years on mechanisms underlying brain plasticity and stroke recovery. Both noninvasive and invasive brain stimulation techniques, such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation and direct cortical stimulation with epidural electrodes, have recently been tested in small studies with stroke patients. The results to date are very promising. Nonetheless, we are still at an early stage in the field and further evidence is needed to assess the clinical impact of this new approach. In this review, we provide readers with a basic introduction to the field, summarize preliminary studies and discuss future directions. Copyright 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17971652     DOI: 10.1159/000107392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis        ISSN: 1015-9770            Impact factor:   2.762


  25 in total

1.  Effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on patients with brain injury and Dysphagia.

Authors:  Leesuk Kim; Min Ho Chun; Bo Ryun Kim; Sook Joung Lee
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2011-12-30

Review 2.  Treatments in context: transcranial direct current brain stimulation as a potential treatment in pediatric psychosis.

Authors:  Christopher N David; Judith L Rapoport; Nitin Gogtay
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.618

Review 3.  Understanding and enhancing motor recovery after stroke using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Erik H Hoyer; Pablo A Celnik
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.406

4.  Comparison of the Effects of 1 Hz and 20 Hz rTMS on Motor Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Chul Kim; Hee Eun Choi; Heejin Jung; Byeong-Ju Lee; Ki Hoon Lee; Young-Joon Lim
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2014-10-30

5.  Stimulating conversation: enhancement of elicited propositional speech in a patient with chronic non-fluent aphasia following transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Roy H Hamilton; Linda Sanders; Jennifer Benson; Olufunsho Faseyitan; Catherine Norise; Margaret Naeser; Paula Martin; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  MRI can Predict the Response to Therapeutic Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Tamer Emara; Nevine El Nahas; Hanaa Abd Elkader; Samia Ashour; Anwar El Etrebi
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2009-04

Review 7.  Invasive cortical stimulation to promote recovery of function after stroke: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  Ela B Plow; James R Carey; Randolph J Nudo; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 8.  Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the understanding of functional recovery mechanisms after stroke.

Authors:  Michael A Dimyan; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 9.  Noninvasive techniques for probing neurocircuitry and treating illness: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).

Authors:  Mark S George; Gary Aston-Jones
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 10.  The corticospinal system and transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke.

Authors:  Monica A Perez; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.119

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.