Literature DB >> 17971461

Faith-based NGOs and healthcare in poor countries: a preliminary exploration of ethical issues.

Saroj Jayasinghe1.   

Abstract

An increasing number of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) provide humanitarian assistance, including healthcare. Some faith-based NGOs combine proselytising work with humanitarian aid. This can result in ethical dilemmas that are rarely discussed in the literature. The article explores several ethical issues, using four generic activities of faith-based NGOs: (1) It is discriminatory to deny aid to a needy community because it provides less opportunity for proselytising work. Allocating aid to a community with fewer health needs but potential for proselytising work is unjust, since it neither maximises welfare (utilitarianism) nor assists the most needy (egalitarianism). (2) Faith-based-NGOs may state that proselytising work combined with humanitarian assistance improves spiritual wellbeing and overall benefit. However, proselytising work creates religious doubts, which could transiently decrease wellbeing. (3) Proselytising work is unlikely to be a perceived need of the population and, if carried out without consent, breaches the principle of autonomy. Such work also exploits the vulnerability of disaster victims. (4) Governments that decline the assistance of a faith-based NGO involved in proselytising work may deprive the needy of aid. Three strategies are proposed: (a) Increase knowledge to empower communities, individuals and governments; information on NGOs could be provided through an accessible register that discloses objectives, funding sources and intended spiritual activities. (b) Clearly demarcate between humanitarian aid from proselytising work, by setting explicit guidelines for humanitarian assistance. (c) Strengthen self-regulation by modifying the Code of Conduct of the Red Cross to state criteria for selecting communities for assistance and procedures for proselytising work.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17971461      PMCID: PMC2598091          DOI: 10.1136/jme.2006.018549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  7 in total

Review 1.  Humanitarianism, pluralism and ombudsmen: do the pieces fit?

Authors:  I Christoplos
Journal:  Disasters       Date:  1999-06

2.  Principles of justice in health care rationing.

Authors:  R Cookson; P Dolan
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Economics, health and development: some ethical dilemmas facing the World Bank and the international community.

Authors:  A Wagstaff
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  The potential of health sector non-governmental organizations: policy options.

Authors:  L Gilson; P D Sen; S Mohammed; P Mujinja
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.344

Review 5.  Beyond informed consent.

Authors:  Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 6.  Contracting out health services in fragile states.

Authors:  Natasha Palmer; Lesley Strong; Abdul Wali; Egbert Sondorp
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-25

7.  Bioethics, vulnerability, and protection.

Authors:  Ruth Macklin
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.898

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Erosion of trust in humanitarian agencies: what strategies might help?

Authors:  Saroj Jayasinghe
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 2.640

2.  The Evolving Landscape of Global Surgery: A Qualitative Study of North American Surgeons' Perspectives on Faith-Based and Academic Initiatives.

Authors:  Danielle I Ellis; Tamara N Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2021-07-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.