Literature DB >> 14959716

Bioethics, vulnerability, and protection.

Ruth Macklin1.   

Abstract

What makes individuals, groups, or even entire countries vulnerable? And why is vulnerability a concern in bioethics? A simple answer to both questions is that vulnerable individuals and groups are subject to exploitation, and exploitation is morally wrong. This analysis is limited to two areas. First is the context of multinational research, in which vulnerable people can be exploited even if they are not harmed, and harmed even if they are not exploited. The type of multinational research likely to raise the most ethical concerns is that in which the investigators or sponsors are from a powerful industrialised country or a giant pharmaceutical company and the research is conducted in a developing country. Second is the situation of women, who are made vulnerable in cultural settings or in entire countries in which they are oppressed and powerless. In the face of cultural values and practices, or governmental policies, these women suffer serious consequences for their health and even lives. Examples are provided, and it is suggested that in some cases vulnerable individuals can be harmed but not exploited. On the positive side, recent developments reveal a new awareness of exploitation and efforts to enhance the ability of developing countries to protect themselves and their citizens from exploitation at the hands of powerful sponsors of research. In addition, human rights principles are increasingly being used to monitor the actions (or inaction) of governments regarding women's reproductive rights and vulnerability with respect to HIV/AIDS, and to take remedial actions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14959716     DOI: 10.1111/1467-8519.00362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioethics        ISSN: 0269-9702            Impact factor:   1.898


  36 in total

1.  Binational Substance Abuse Research and Internal Review Boards: Human Subject Risks and Suggestions for Protections.

Authors:  Victor Garcia
Journal:  Hum Organ       Date:  2009

2.  Navigating the challenges of global reproductive health research.

Authors:  Amy L Stenson; Chisina T Kapungu; Stacie E Geller; Suellen Miller
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Inclusive and relevant language: the use of the concepts of autonomy, dignity and vulnerability in different contexts.

Authors:  Hans Morten Haugen
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2010-08

4.  Strategies to minimize risks and exploitation in phase one trials on healthy subjects.

Authors:  Adil E Shamoo; David B Resnik
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 11.229

5.  Research on environmental health interventions: ethical problems and solutions.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Darryl C Zeldin; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 6.  Partnership as an ethical model for medical research in developing countries: the example of the "implementation trial".

Authors:  D W Dowdy
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Solidarity: a (new) ethic for global health policy.

Authors:  Shawn H E Harmon
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2006-12

8.  Faith-based NGOs and healthcare in poor countries: a preliminary exploration of ethical issues.

Authors:  Saroj Jayasinghe
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 9.  Clinical research with economically disadvantaged populations.

Authors:  Colleen C Denny; Christine Grady
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  Rethinking the vulnerability of minority populations in research.

Authors:  Wendy Rogers; Margaret Meek Lange
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.