Literature DB >> 17971172

Intraspecific diversity and dominant genotypes resist plant invasions.

Gregory M Crutsinger1, Lara Souza, Nathan J Sanders.   

Abstract

Numerous studies have asked whether communities with many species deter invasions more so than do species-poor communities or whether dominant species deter invasion by colonizing species. However, little is known about whether high intraspecific diversity can deter biological invasions or whether particular genotypes might deter invasions. In this study, we present experimental evidence that intraspecific diversity and particular genotypes of tall goldenrod, Solidago altissima, can act as a barrier to colonization by new species. We found that biomass of colonizing species was negatively correlated with genotypic diversity, and particular genotypes affected the richness, cover, and biomass of colonizing species. Stem density of S. altissima increased with genotypic diversity and varied among genotypes, suggesting that stem density is a key mechanism in limiting colonization dynamics in this system. Our results indicate that the loss of intraspecific diversity within a dominant plant species can increase susceptibility to plant invasions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17971172     DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01118.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  39 in total

1.  Evolutionary indirect effects of biological invasions.

Authors:  Jennifer A Lau
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Differential response to frequency-dependent interactions: an experimental test using genotypes of an invasive grass.

Authors:  Alexandra Collins; E M Hart; J Molofsky
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Invasion of an intact plant community: the role of population versus community level diversity.

Authors:  Cynthia C Chang; Melinda D Smith
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Community monopolization: local adaptation enhances priority effects in an evolving metacommunity.

Authors:  Mark C Urban; Luc De Meester
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Community genetics: what have we accomplished and where should we be going?

Authors:  Erika I Hersch-Green; Nash E Turley; Marc T J Johnson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  A crucial step toward realism: responses to climate change from an evolving metacommunity perspective.

Authors:  Mark C Urban; Luc De Meester; Mark Vellend; Robby Stoks; Joost Vanoverbeke
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 5.183

Review 7.  Conserving intraspecific variation for nature's contributions to people.

Authors:  Simone Des Roches; Linwood H Pendleton; Beth Shapiro; Eric P Palkovacs
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 15.460

Review 8.  The importance of genomic variation for biodiversity, ecosystems and people.

Authors:  Madlen Stange; Rowan D H Barrett; Andrew P Hendry
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  Intraspecific diversity regulates fungal productivity and respiration.

Authors:  Anna Wilkinson; Martin Solan; Andrew F S Taylor; Ian J Alexander; David Johnson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A road map for integrating eco-evolutionary processes into biodiversity models.

Authors:  Wilfried Thuiller; Tamara Münkemüller; Sébastien Lavergne; David Mouillot; Nicolas Mouquet; Katja Schiffers; Dominique Gravel
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 9.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.