Literature DB >> 17970649

Context learning in the rodent hippocampus.

Mark C Fuhs1, David S Touretzky.   

Abstract

We present a Bayesian statistical theory of context learning in the rodent hippocampus. While context is often defined in an experimental setting in relation to specific background cues or task demands, we advance a single, more general notion of context that suffices for a variety of learning phenomena. Specifically, a context is defined as a statistically stationary distribution of experiences, and context learning is defined as the problem of how to form contexts out of groups of experiences that cluster together in time. The challenge of context learning is solving the model selection problem: How many contexts make up the rodent's world? Solving this problem requires balancing two opposing goals: minimize the variability of the distribution of experiences within a context and minimize the likelihood of transitioning between contexts. The theory provides an understanding of why hippocampal place cell remapping sometimes develops gradually over many days of experience and why even consistent landmark differences may need to be relearned after other environmental changes. The theory provides an explanation for progressive performance improvements in serial reversal learning, based on a clear dissociation between the incremental process of context learning and the relatively abrupt context selection process. The impact of partial reinforcement on reversal learning is also addressed. Finally, the theory explains why alternating sequence learning does not consistently result in unique context-dependent sequence representations in hippocampus.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17970649     DOI: 10.1162/neco.2007.19.12.3173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Comput        ISSN: 0899-7667            Impact factor:   2.026


  14 in total

1.  Context-dependent decision-making: a simple Bayesian model.

Authors:  Kevin Lloyd; David S Leslie
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  Believing in dopamine.

Authors:  Samuel J Gershman; Naoshige Uchida
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  The computational nature of memory modification.

Authors:  Samuel J Gershman; Marie-H Monfils; Kenneth A Norman; Yael Niv
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Effects of pharmacological manipulations of NMDA-receptors on deliberation in the Multiple-T task.

Authors:  Anna Blumenthal; Adam Steiner; Kelsey Seeland; A David Redish
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 2.877

5.  Gender differences and lateralization in the distribution pattern of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor in developing rat hippocampus: an immunohistochemical study.

Authors:  Javad Hami; Hamed Kheradmand; Hossein Haghir
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 5.046

6.  Dissociable neural correlates of item and context retrieval in the medial temporal lobes.

Authors:  Wei-Chun Wang; Andrew P Yonelinas; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Sex differences and laterality of insulin receptor distribution in developing rat hippocampus: an immunohistochemical study.

Authors:  Javad Hami; Hamed Kheradmand; Hossein Haghir
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.444

Review 8.  Viewpoints: how the hippocampus contributes to memory, navigation and cognition.

Authors:  John Lisman; György Buzsáki; Howard Eichenbaum; Lynn Nadel; Charan Ranganath; A David Redish
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Reinforcement learning and Bayesian inference provide complementary models for the unique advantage of adolescents in stochastic reversal.

Authors:  Maria K Eckstein; Sarah L Master; Ronald E Dahl; Linda Wilbrecht; Anne G E Collins
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 5.811

10.  The influence of Markov decision process structure on the possible strategic use of working memory and episodic memory.

Authors:  Eric A Zilli; Michael E Hasselmo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.