Literature DB >> 17970264

Evaluating the influence of postsession reinforcement on choice of reinforcers.

Tiffany Kodak1, Dorothea C Lerman, Nathan Call.   

Abstract

Factors that influence reinforcer choice have been examined in a number of applied studies (e.g., Neef, Mace, Shea, & Shade, 1992; Shore, Iwata, DeLeon, Kahng, & Smith, 1997; Tustin, 1994). However, no applied studies have evaluated the effects of postsession reinforcement on choice between concurrently available reinforcers, even though basic findings indicate that this is an important factor to consider (Hursh, 1978; Zeiler, 1999). In this bridge investigation, we evaluated the influence of postsession reinforcement on choice of two food items when task responding was reinforced on progressive-ratio schedules. Participants were 3 children who had been diagnosed with developmental disabilities. Results indicated that response allocation shifted from one food item to the other food item under thinner schedules of reinforcement when no postsession reinforcement was provided. These findings suggest that the efficacy of instructional programs or treatments for problem behavior may be improved by restricting reinforcers outside treatment sessions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17970264      PMCID: PMC1986696          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2007.40-515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  17 in total

1.  Assessing reinforcers under progressive schedule requirements.

Authors:  H S Roane; D C Lerman; C M Vorndran
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

2.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A preliminary analysis of adaptive responding under open and closed economies.

Authors:  Henry S Roane; Nathan A Call; Terry S Falcomata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2005

4.  A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.

Authors:  W Fisher; C C Piazza; L G Bowman; L P Hagopian; J C Owens; I Slevin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

5.  Effects of reinforcer rate and reinforcer quality on time allocation: Extensions of matching theory to educational settings.

Authors:  N A Neef
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

6.  Behavioral economics.

Authors:  S R Hursh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Demand for food on fixed-ratio schedules as a function of the quality of concurrently available reinforcement.

Authors:  S E Lea; T J Roper
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Reversed effects in closed and open economies.

Authors:  M Zeiler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  The economics of daily consumption controlling food- and water-reinforced responding.

Authors:  S R Hursh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Emergence of reinforcer preference as a function of schedule requirements and stimulus similarity.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; B A Iwata; H L Goh; A S Worsdell
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1997
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  On the applied use of progressive-ratio schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  Henry S Roane
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2008

Review 2.  Applied implications of reinforcement history effects.

Authors:  Claire St Peter Pipkin; Timothy R Vollmer
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2009

3.  Behavioral economics: a tutorial for behavior analysts in practice.

Authors:  Derek D Reed; Christopher R Niileksela; Brent A Kaplan
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2013
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.