Literature DB >> 17969686

Laboratory investigations of enhanced sulfate reduction as a groundwater arsenic remediation strategy.

A R Keimowitz1, B J Mailloux, P Cole, M Stute, H J Simpson, S N Chillrud.   

Abstract

Landfills have the potential to mobilize arsenic via induction of reducing conditions in groundwater and subsequent desorption from or dissolution of arsenic-bearing iron phases. Laboratory incubation experiments were conducted with materials from a landfill where such processes are occurring. These experiments explored the potential for induced sulfate reduction to immobilize dissolved arsenic in situ. The native microbial community at this site reduced sulfate in the presence of added acetate. Acetate respiration and sulfate reduction were observed concurrent with dissolved iron concentrations initially increasing from 0.6 microM (0.03 mg L(-1)) to a maximum of 111 microM (6.1 mg L(-1)) and subsequently decreasing to 0.74 microM (0.04 mg L(-1)). Dissolved arsenic concentrations initially covaried with iron but subsequently increased again as sulfide accumulated, consistent with the formation of soluble thioarsenite complexes. Dissolved arsenic concentrations subsequently decreased again from a maximum of 2 microM (148 microg L(-1)) to 0.3 microM (22 microg L(-1)), consistent with formation of sulfide mineral phases or increased arsenic sorption at higher pH values. Disequilibrium processes may also explain this second arsenic peak. The maximum iron and arsenic concentrations observed in the lab represent conditions most equivalent to the in situ conditions. These findings indicate that enhanced sulfate reduction merits further study as a potential in situ groundwater arsenic remediation strategy at landfills and other sites with elevated arsenic in reducing groundwater.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17969686      PMCID: PMC3155844          DOI: 10.1021/es061957q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  10 in total

1.  Arsenic redistribution between sediments and water near a highly contaminated source.

Authors:  Alison R Keimowitz; Yan Zheng; Steven N Chillrud; Brian Mailloux; Hun Bok Jung; Martin Stute; H James Simpson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Landfill-stimulated iron reduction and arsenic release at the Coakley Superfund Site (NH).

Authors:  Jamie L deLemos; Benjamin C Bostick; Carl E Renshaw; Stefan Stürup; Xiahong Feng
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Removal of arsenic from groundwater by zerovalent iron and the role of sulfide.

Authors:  R Köber; E Welter; M Ebert; A Dahmke
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Removal of sulfate and heavy metals by sulfate reducing bacteria in short-term bench scale upflow anaerobic packed bed reactor runs.

Authors:  Tony Jong; David L Parry
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 11.236

5.  The influence of sulfur and iron on dissolved arsenic concentrations in the shallow subsurface under changing redox conditions.

Authors:  Peggy A O'Day; Dimitri Vlassopoulos; Robert Root; Nelson Rivera
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-09-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Arsenic in groundwater in eastern New England: occurrence, controls, and human health implications.

Authors:  Joseph D Ayotte; Denise L Montgomery; Sarah M Flanagan; Keith W Robinson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Heavy metal speciation in solid-phase materials from a bacterial sulfate reducing bioreactor using sequential extraction procedure combined with acid volatile sulfide analysis.

Authors:  Tony Jong; David L Parry
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2004-03-17

8.  Arsenite retention mechanisms within estuarine sediments of Pescadero, CA.

Authors:  Benjamin C Bostick; Cynthia Chen; Scott Fendorf
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Adsorption of Pb(II), Cu(II), Cd(II), Zn(II), Ni(II), Fe(II), and As(V) on bacterially produced metal sulfides.

Authors:  Tony Jong; David L Parry
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 8.128

10.  Comparison of arsenic(V) and arsenic(III) sorption onto iron oxide minerals: implications for arsenic mobility.

Authors:  Suvasis Dixit; Janet G Hering
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 9.028

  10 in total
  10 in total

1.  Simultaneous measurements of arsenic and sulfide using diffusive gradients in thin films technique (DGT).

Authors:  Lv Xu; Qin Sun; Shiming Ding; Mengdan Gong; Chaosheng Zhang
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 2.  Arsenic-transforming microbes and their role in biomining processes.

Authors:  L Drewniak; A Sklodowska
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Manganese redox buffering limits arsenic release from contaminated sediments, Union Lake, New Jersey.

Authors:  Alison R Keimowitz; Brian J Mailloux; Karen Wovkulich; Jennifer Harkness; James M Ross; Steven N Chillrud
Journal:  Appl Geochem       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.524

4.  In Situ Magnetite Formation and Long-Term Arsenic Immobilization under Advective Flow Conditions.

Authors:  Jing Sun; Steven N Chillrud; Brian J Mailloux; Benjamin C Bostick
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Evidence of Decoupling between Arsenic and Phosphate in Shallow Groundwater of Bangladesh and Potential Implications.

Authors:  Z Aziz; B C Bostick; Y Zheng; M R Huq; M M Rahman; K M Ahmed; A van Geen
Journal:  Appl Geochem       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 3.524

6.  The impact of biostimulation on the fate of sulfate and associated sulfur dynamics in groundwater.

Authors:  Ziheng Miao; Concepcion Carreón-Diazconti; Kenneth C Carroll; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 3.188

7.  Arsenic mobilization from sediments in microcosms under sulfate reduction.

Authors:  Jing Sun; Andrew N Quicksall; Steven N Chillrud; Brian J Mailloux; Benjamin C Bostick
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 7.086

8.  Enhanced and stabilized arsenic retention in microcosms through the microbial oxidation of ferrous iron by nitrate.

Authors:  Jing Sun; Steven N Chillrud; Brian J Mailloux; Martin Stute; Rajesh Singh; Hailiang Dong; Christopher J Lepre; Benjamin C Bostick
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 7.086

9.  In situ arsenic immobilisation for coastal aquifers using stimulated iron cycling: Lab-based viability assessment.

Authors:  Alyssa Barron; Jing Sun; Stefania Passaretti; Chiara Sbarbati; Maurizio Barbieri; Nicolò Colombani; James Jamieson; Benjamin C Bostick; Yan Zheng; Micòl Mastrocicco; Marco Petitta; Henning Prommer
Journal:  Appl Geochem       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.524

10.  Thioarsenate Formation Coupled with Anaerobic Arsenite Oxidation by a Sulfate-Reducing Bacterium Isolated from a Hot Spring.

Authors:  Geng Wu; Liuqin Huang; Hongchen Jiang; Yue'e Peng; Wei Guo; Ziyu Chen; Weiyu She; Qinghai Guo; Hailiang Dong
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 5.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.