Literature DB >> 17968941

Coating thickness of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles affects R2 relaxivity.

Leslie E W LaConte1, Nitin Nitin, Omar Zurkiya, Daniela Caruntu, Charles J O'Connor, Xiaoping Hu, Gang Bao.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of coating thickness on the relaxivity of iron oxide nanoparticles.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Monocrystalline superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (MIONs), coated with a polyethylene glycol (PEG)-modified, phospholipid micelle coating, with different PEG molecular weights, were prepared. The particle diameters were measured with dynamic light scattering (DLS) and electron microscopy (EM). The R1 and R2 of MIONs were measured using a bench-top nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) relaxometer. pH was varied for some measurements. Monte Carlo simulations of proton movement in a field with nanometer-sized magnetic inhomogeneities were performed.
RESULTS: Increasing the molecular weight of the PEG portion of the micelle coating increased overall particle diameter. As coating thickness increases, the R2 decreases and the R1 increases. Changing pH has no effect on relaxivity. The Monte Carlo simulations suggest that the effect of coating size on R2 relaxivity is determined by two competing factors: the physical exclusion of protons from the magnetic field and the residence time for protons within the coating zone.
CONCLUSION: Coating thickness can significantly impact the R2, and the R2/R1 ratio, of a MION contrast agent. An understanding of the relationship between coating properties and changes in relaxivity is critical for designing magnetic nanoparticle probes for molecular imaging applications using MRI. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17968941     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  57 in total

1.  Off-resonance saturation MRI of superparamagnetic nanoprobes: theoretical models and experimental validations.

Authors:  Chalermchai Khemtong; Osamu Togao; Jimin Ren; Chase W Kessinger; Masaya Takahashi; A Dean Sherry; Jinming Gao
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Development of multifunctional hyaluronan-coated nanoparticles for imaging and drug delivery to cancer cells.

Authors:  Mohammad H El-Dakdouki; David C Zhu; Kheireddine El-Boubbou; Medha Kamat; Jianjun Chen; Wei Li; Xuefei Huang
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 6.988

3.  Hybrid PET-optical imaging using targeted probes.

Authors:  Matthias Nahrendorf; Edmund Keliher; Brett Marinelli; Peter Waterman; Paolo Fumene Feruglio; Lioubov Fexon; Misha Pivovarov; Filip K Swirski; Mikael J Pittet; Claudio Vinegoni; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Assessment and comparison of magnetic nanoparticles as MRI contrast agents in a rodent model of human hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Lihong Bu; Jin Xie; Kai Chen; Jing Huang; Zoraida P Aguilar; Andrew Wang; Kin Wai Sun; Mei-Sze Chua; Samuel So; Zhen Cheng; Henry S Eden; Baozhong Shen; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Release activation of iron oxide nanoparticles: (REACTION) a novel environmentally sensitive MRI paradigm.

Authors:  Dorit Granot; Erik M Shapiro
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Impact of Serum Proteins on MRI Contrast Agents: Cellular Binding and T2 relaxation.

Authors:  Alexandra Hill; Christine K Payne
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.361

7.  PEGylated squalenoyl-gemcitabine nanoparticles for the treatment of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Alice Gaudin; Eric Song; Amanda R King; Jennifer K Saucier-Sawyer; Ranjit Bindra; Didier Desmaële; Patrick Couvreur; W Mark Saltzman
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  pH-Sensitive MR Responses Induced by Dendron-Functionalized SPIONs.

Authors:  Indrajit Saha; Kathleen E Chaffee; Chuansong Duanmu; Brooke M Woods; Ashley M Stokes; Laura E Buck; Laura L Walkup; Narsimha Sattenapally; Jodi Huggenvik; Yong Gao; Boyd M Goodson
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 4.126

Review 9.  Design and fabrication of magnetic nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery and imaging.

Authors:  Omid Veiseh; Jonathan W Gunn; Miqin Zhang
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 15.470

10.  Coating Evaluation and Purification of Monodisperse, Water-Soluble, Magnetic Nanoparticles Using Sucrose Density Gradient Ultracentrifugation.

Authors:  Andrew M Prantner; Jun Chen; Christopher B Murray; Nathalie Scholler
Journal:  Chem Mater       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 9.811

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.