Literature DB >> 17965714

Recurrent DNA copy number variation in the laboratory mouse.

Chris M Egan1, Srinath Sridhar, Michael Wigler, Ira M Hall.   

Abstract

Different species, populations and individuals vary considerably in the copy number of discrete segments of their genomes. The manner and frequency with which these genetic differences arise over generational time is not well understood. Taking advantage of divergence among lineages sharing a recent common ancestry, we have conducted a genome-wide analysis of spontaneous copy number variation (CNV) in the laboratory mouse. We used high-resolution microarrays to identify 38 CNVs among 14 colonies of the C57BL/6 strain spanning approximately 967 generations of inbreeding, and we examined these loci in 12 additional strains. It is clear from our results that many CNVs arise through a highly nonrandom process: 18 of 38 were the product of recurrent mutation, and rates of change varied roughly four orders of magnitude across different loci. Recurrent CNVs are found throughout the genome, affect 43 genes and fluctuate in copy number over mere hundreds of generations, observations that raise questions about their contribution to natural variation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17965714     DOI: 10.1038/ng.2007.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Genet        ISSN: 1061-4036            Impact factor:   38.330


  80 in total

Review 1.  Of mice and rats: key species variations in the sexual differentiation of brain and behavior.

Authors:  P J Bonthuis; K H Cox; B T Searcy; P Kumar; S Tobet; E F Rissman
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 8.606

2.  Homeostatic plasticity mechanisms are required for juvenile, but not adult, ocular dominance plasticity.

Authors:  Adam Ranson; Claire E J Cheetham; Kevin Fox; Frank Sengpiel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Genome-wide mapping and assembly of structural variant breakpoints in the mouse genome.

Authors:  Aaron R Quinlan; Royden A Clark; Svetlana Sokolova; Mitchell L Leibowitz; Yujun Zhang; Matthew E Hurles; Joshua C Mell; Ira M Hall
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Identification of copy number variation hotspots in human populations.

Authors:  Wenqing Fu; Feng Zhang; Yi Wang; Xun Gu; Li Jin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Variation in CCL3L1 copy number in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Patrick L Taormina; Jessica A Satkoski Trask; David G Smith; Sreetharan Kanthaswamy
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 0.982

6.  The Mouse Universal Genotyping Array: From Substrains to Subspecies.

Authors:  Andrew P Morgan; Chen-Ping Fu; Chia-Yu Kao; Catherine E Welsh; John P Didion; Liran Yadgary; Leeanna Hyacinth; Martin T Ferris; Timothy A Bell; Darla R Miller; Paola Giusti-Rodriguez; Randal J Nonneman; Kevin D Cook; Jason K Whitmire; Lisa E Gralinski; Mark Keller; Alan D Attie; Gary A Churchill; Petko Petkov; Patrick F Sullivan; Jennifer R Brennan; Leonard McMillan; Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  Substrain differences reveal novel disease-modifying gene candidates that alter the clinical course of a rodent model of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Leslie E Summers deLuca; Natalia B Pikor; Jennifer O'Leary; Georgina Galicia-Rosas; Lesley A Ward; Dustin Defreitas; Trisha M Finlay; Shalina S Ousman; Lucy R Osborne; Jennifer L Gommerman
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 8.  Inheritance patterns of progressive hearing loss in laboratory strains of mice.

Authors:  Konrad Noben-Trauth; Kenneth R Johnson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Extensive variation between inbred mouse strains due to endogenous L1 retrotransposition.

Authors:  Keiko Akagi; Jingfeng Li; Robert M Stephens; Natalia Volfovsky; David E Symer
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 10.  Aging genomes: a necessary evil in the logic of life.

Authors:  Jan Vijg
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 4.345

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.